Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim burton holiday
Appearance
Tim burton holiday was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.
Doesn't seem legit to me but perhaps you Goth masturbaters will tell us differently. Mdchachi|Talk 22:19, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Agh...I was just going to tell you not to call anybody names (not even Goth kids), but then I went and read the article. Please sombody delete it, it's causing me almost physical pain (and it's probably just an attempt at a lame joke, not a serious article - at least I hope so) -- Ferkelparade π 23:12, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- A neologism at best. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:15, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Sure seems like a joke. If it has wider currency, it hasn't shown up on a web search. What happened to the good old days of repression, when we didn't talk about those things? Geogre 02:01, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Idiotic, at best. -R. fiend 07:00, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. What exactly are "goth masturbaters", pray tell? —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 07:11, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- After reading this, I can tell you that my trip to Disneyland this weekend will include a visit to the "Haunted Mansion Holiday." It'll be impossible not to think of this little tome. A redirect to The Haunted Mansion might be OK, but it wouldn't reduce me to tears to see this deleted. Therefore, delete as a neologism/joke/insult listing. - Lucky 6.9 23:13, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Slang neologism that will probably be out of date by the time you read this vote! P Ingerson 11:37, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, 'cause I like to be contrarian now and then. I wonder if scissorhanded boys do this too? Wyss 12:58, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. It made me smile, but it's really just an in-gag. Adambisset 00:26, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)