Talk:Rysy

Mountains Top‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovakia Mid‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Error?

Well... "Rysy is the highest Tatra mountain available to individual tourists (without a guide)." What about slovakian mount "Lomnica" where tourists can go using gondola lift (I have no idea how that "device" is called in English)...

Rysy are the highest mountain in Poland but the article says that Rysy is the highest Tatra mountain availible to indyvidual tourists. 212.2.100.132 20:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I clarified it by adding 'on foot.'--Svetovid (talk) 12:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rysy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070617184427/http://www.mojetatry.pl/podstrony/Rysy_miejsca_5.php to http://www.mojetatry.pl/podstrony/Rysy_miejsca_5.php
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://zipi.r-k.pl/panorama/20070916_085614pan360Rysy.jpg.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://zipi.r-k.pl/panorama/20050527_161348pan360Rysy.jpg.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090927111846/http://www.skialpinizm.pl/tatry360/data/rysy_1.html to http://www.skialpinizm.pl/tatry360/data/rysy_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Northwestern peak altitude

I just wanted to note that 89.78.208.63 has changed the height of the northwestern peak from 2499m to 2500m, and again after being reverted by Merangs. There is a source that suggests that 2499 might not be accurate, but it really goes no farther than to call it "2499.9±1" and say "maybe". Not sure how to sort this out, just wanted to note it. – BMacZero (🗩) 04:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]