Talk:Vidraru
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Vidraru)
from VfD:
No context, barely any content. Full text is: "Excelent place for nudism and erotic art". "What links here" suggests it is a resevoir or dam in Romania, but that information wouldn't even make a proper stub. --Woggly 10:55, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC) Keep current redirect. --Woggly 12:28, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Excellent place for Delete. --fvw* 11:24, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)- Keep fvw* 22:59, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)
Delete:Photograph it, give it a false name, and promise it a big career in Hollywood, and then delete it. Geogre 14:03, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)- Rewritten, but I can't change my vote. The reason is that what it says now is what you already know if you followed a link to the article, and if you typed it into the search, you really don't get anything. Geogre 05:06, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Come on, Geogre. I had no idea "Vidraru" was a lake before today and neither did you. "It's a stub" simply is not a criterion for deletion but an invitation to construct.Dr Zen 05:34, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- No, "it's a stub" isn't a qualification. "It's a substub" is, when the contents are the same as the title. "Vidraru" = "Lake Vidraru": If you don't know the thing by its full title, you won't/can't search it. If you do, you know it's a lake. Geogre 15:31, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Geogre, see its redirect target Lake Vidraru now. I've learned more already. Samaritan 07:18, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep redirect. The Lake Vidraru is better both for being a title our users will search more often and because its contents actually say more than the title. Geogre 15:31, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Rewritten, but I can't change my vote. The reason is that what it says now is what you already know if you followed a link to the article, and if you typed it into the search, you really don't get anything. Geogre 05:06, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete, better, speedy as insufficiently informative substub. Kappa 16:01, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)- Keep now Kappa 06:14, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete it speedily. Jayjg 20:55, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I've made it into at least a stub.Dr Zen 23:08, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep geo-stub about a man-made European lake that is completely unrelated to the nonsense sentence voters before Dr Zen were voting on. Samaritan 02:18, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Hey, I wasn't trying to fool anybody! The "what links here" made it clear that the lake was what the page referred to. It took me less time to make a stub than it would have done to list it here, so I thought, why not?Dr Zen 03:35, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I've been bold and redirected to Kappa's fortuitous creation Lake Vidraru, a better-still stub which I stumbled upon looking for an appropriate category for Vidraru (Category:Geography of Romania, it turned out). Samaritan 07:16, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, as redirected by Samaritan. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:22, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep now. -leigh 10:06, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
Start a discussion about improving the Vidraru page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Vidraru" page.
