Jump to content

User talk:Sethant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives:

Nomination of Barry Hess for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Hess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Hess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CHE260

Hey Seth Brett here just did assignment 5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwilrenewable (talk • contribs) 21:35, 7 June 2013 (UTC) Hey Seth this is Alex letting you know that I just did assignment #4. Please check it out. AlexAlexander.reese (talk) 20:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dr. Anthony this is Brett Wilson I have created my account. (Bwilrenewable (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hello Seth, This is Alex Reese letting you know that I have created an account.

Alex Alexander.reese (talk) 02:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Santhony!! I have created that wiki account. Have a jolly good day. Thanks, Michelle Cirrito Mcirrito912 (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, I've created my user page. (Stockroom Asst.) REEstudent (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, Is there a way to go to articles that have been listed as needing editing? It was one of the choices when I first logged in, but now I cannot find it. REEstudent (talk) 23:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've joined the troops. - Forest F. Tree19 (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seth!

I hope this is the correct place to contact you... I am new to Wikipedia!

Thanks! Krista Kristagoit (talk) 23:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Anthony, My article edits are now live http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_energy_conversion thanks Michael.weeks (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth

Hey Seth, I finally created my user page here on wiki. I'm still getting used to this whole process but it will only take time.

BeatlesFan65 (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC) (Benjamin Morris)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, It was the same page I saw when I first signed on. Thanks! Also, it appears that you cannot insert a comma into a section heading. This section was hidden from view because it was called "Seth," instead of just "Seth". Good to know! REEstudent (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections

Seth, I just finished my three small corrections here on Wiki. I just wanted to let you know Thanks, BeatlesFan65 (talk) 22:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Benjamin Morris[reply]

I, Michael P., have made my user page for the first assignment. Nightingale8283 (talk) 22:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have made my three corrections. -Michael P. Nightingale8283 (talk) 22:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That was easy...

Hi again!

I think I got more than three changes... Let me know if I did this correctly!

Thanks!

Kristagoit (talk) 00:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Seth,

Just letting you know that I have created a wikipedia account, and edited a few things. See you in the morning!

Sincerely, Alyssa

Amd9 (talk) 07:07, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, here's my short note. Enjoy your weekend! Kaleb "Kaleb.LT (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)"[reply]

Corrections

Hey Seth, just letting you know I've made my 3 corrections. Thanks! Kaleb "Kaleb.LT (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)"[reply]

Dr. Anthony, I have made corrections to the following three articles: Second Merkel Cabinet for spelling, grammar, and clarity. Braking action for links to other articles and clarity. Limbo (dance) for spelling, grammar, and clarity. REEstudent (talk) 18:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Made the corrections Tree19 (talk) 21:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Account Created

Professor Anthony account created.(Michael.weeks (talk) 20:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Account created and edits made

Hi Seth!

I made edits to annoying verbiage in the "Pyrolysis" article. I validated the changes before sending this, but I didn't notice anything that showed the text was changed, but then I'm a newbie.

Later ChrisB WIGEfan (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dr. Anthony,

This is Helen Allen from your CHEM 260 class writing to let you know that I have created an account on Wikipidia!

Kind Regards,

Heleniliff (talk) 21:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Vuong signing on.

Hey Seth, I have completed the necessary steps in creating my user page and have found your talk page, as you may have noticed. Sincerely, KVuong (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Seth, I have made my 3 minor edits as follows: Shuggie Otis minor wording change. Photovoltaics minor wording change. Ferrofluid minor punctuation change.

Thank you kindly, KVuong (talk) 02:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CHEM260

Hey Seth, I made my account and hope to make some corrections here soon!

Thanks, Justin

Wallace.miller (talk) 02:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth Anthony, I have created my account. Thanks, Danielle Sayres. ("Dsports1 (talk) 04:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)")[reply]

Assignment 1 and 2

Hey Proffessor, here is the note you asked for.

Eric Reynolds ("OITowl3 (talk) 04:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)")[reply]

Waving with all five fingers....

Kirwan Fox dropped by to say hi, and let you know I signed up. Now I'm off to edit something. Then I'll be lurking at iHop until the wee hours.

EDIT I have now also completed Part 2 of this assignment. I have a dream of riding this train to Lhasa some day. I fixed a few date formatting and grammatical errors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qinghai%E2%80%93Tibet_Railway See you at iHop.

Bye for now Drew.P.Branch (talk) 04:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User page creation successful

Here it is with my name and everything. Nathan.garrelts (talk) 04:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey seth, finished my editing.

Eric Reynolds — Preceding unsigned comment added by OITowl3 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth

Just letting you know that I got my page created. Hannah.dimich (talk) 05:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Project Point #2

Hey Seth,

Just letting you know that I got my 3 edits done. Hannah.dimich (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proyecto Punto Numero Uno

¡Hola Seth!

Just letting you know I got my page up

~Will

Willdogg698 (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits Complete

Just letting you know I've made 3 edits to the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion page!

~Will

Willdogg698 (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections

Hey Seth, I have made my three corrections. Thank you, Danielle Sayres (Dsports1 (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Chem 260

Hi Seth, I definitely did not forget to do this assignment which is why I'm sending you this message now.

Clee845 (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

edits completed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fill

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octalux

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Movement_(literature)

I tried my best they where minor ones.Michael.weeks (talk) 01:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Editing

Hey Seth, just finished completing my edits on three Wikipedia articles.

Clee845 (talk) 02:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've got logged in Seth.

Chris Pittenger

(Pitts0608 (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Corrections Made

Good Afternoon Dr. Anthony,

I made three typo corrections to the pages, 'Vasos Vacios", and 'Gelbelsee".

Thanks!

Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heleniliff (talk • contribs) 17:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Created Page

Nigel Bliss has created a page Anotherleap (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, I found four topics in which I feel need to be revised. These two topic do not have enough information presented:Electrochemical Battery and Fuel Cell. These two topics need to be interpreted so that anyone with a basic understanding of chemistry could understand the message: Electrochemical Cell and Electrochemical Potential. The Electrochemical Battery page does not have very much information. I could talk about the different kinds of batteries and add a basic chemical understanding of the functionality behind this process. The Fuel Cell page could use a few more examples of how fuel cells can be used. The Electrochemical Cell page needs to be written in a way that more people could understand it, especially in the Equilibrium reaction section. The Electrochemical Potential page needs to be more understandable, especially in the parts where it discusses the concepts of thermodynamics and equilibrium. I hope this is everything you are looking for.

Alex ReeseAlexander.reese (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Revision Areas

Seth,

The four topics that I found which need revisions are:

The Faraday’s laws page does not have very much information, and the explanation of the laws is chunked and awkward to read through. I found myself getting a bit lost through it, and feel it should be broken down much further so that someone with only a basic understanding of chemistry could understand the concepts.

The Electrochemical Battery page has information about the uses and various types of batteries, but the page lacks the science behind the technology. A basic chemical understanding should be added to this page.

I was surprised by the half-reaction page in that it seems to be missing a substantial amount of information. A component that could be added to this page is half-reactions in acidic vs. basic conditions. The explanation is very brief, and uses some more advanced chemical terminology that a basic chemistry student may not understand.

A more advanced knowledge of chemistry would be necessary in order to navigate the Electrochemical cell page. Much of the terminology used is more advanced and left unexplained to the reader. Further, the chemistry content could be expanded on, and the significance of the electrochemical cell should be emphasized.

Thanks, Alyssa Amd9 (talk) 06:09, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I completed the three edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitts0608 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

I have to admit while educational this was a very difficult task for me. I did the best I could and hope it is good enough or what you are looking for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_energy_conversion

very vague. I would hope it would have more than just one reference to an article. Maybe more on the conversion process not sure

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biobattery

How it works section is not complete I don't think.Protons H+ and E- which make electricity doesn't sound right The chemical equation isn't blanced properly under process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_battery

the reaction isn't balanced properly. Shouldn't this statement have a citation or reference > "Aluminium-chlorine battery was patented by United States Air Force in the 1970s and designed mostly for military applications. They use aluminium anodes and chlorine on graphite substrate cathodes. Required elevated temperatures to be operational."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinc%E2%80%93air_battery

cathode reaction has a 1/2 O2 is that even possible?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkaline_fuel_cell

unbalanced chemical reaction

Michael.weeks (talk) 20:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles needing work

  The four articles I found that could use some work are half-reaction, battery (electricity), chemical reaction, and Daniell cell. 
  With half-reaction, the coverage seemed extremely short. It could maybe mention how it works under different conditions.
  For battery (electricity), there could be more definition for batterey components instead of facts about sales for previous years. 
  The chemical reaction article uses some technical terms and is an extremely long description. It could be made easier to understand and could also be shortened so there is not as much unnecessary information.
  For the Daniell cell, there are way too many technical terms that could be confusing to someone with little or no chemistry background.

(Dsports1 (talk) 20:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Assignment 3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry There is no recent developments listed past the 1970’s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxidation The portion explaining reduction potentials could be explained more clearly and intensively.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry The portion explaining how to balance reactions in acidic conditions uses a fairly complicated reaction. Simpler reactions would be easier to understand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry The same goes for balancing reactions in basic conditions. It’s too complicated and can be explained more effectively.

OITowl3 (talk) 01:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, The two articles I found that were too short/missing something are:

Water-activated battery A very short article that is not clear as to why these batteries have less heavy metals than regular batteries.
Solid-state battery The second sentence makes claims about materials in the batteries, but is unclear about what materials it is referring to. I suspect that it may be referring to the solid electrolytes. It is also a very short page.

The two articles I found that were too technical are:

Lithium-air battery The operation section of this article is hard to understand with a lot of organic lingo.
Flow battery The description made my brain tired. It contained technical words I have never heard of and it failed to reference them. The rest of the article was similar.

REEstudent (talk) 02:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth, Lacking information Electrochemical cell could use an example of how to calculate the difference in voltage. Electrode potential under the Measurement section, they mention a center electrode, but never mention its purpose.

Too technical Fuel cell the half reaction equations should have the molecules name either beside or under it, so people know what they are and the table further down the page is very hard to read, follow, and has no rhyme or reason to its order Tree19 (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User Page Created

Hey Seth,

My User Page is now online and I can start editing wikipedia now.

-Matthew LaCount ("Mlacount82891 (talk) 02:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)")[reply]

Assignment #3 Four Articles

Hey Seth,

Here is assignment number three:

I am going to add some more information to electrochemical cells. It seems like there is quite a bit missing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell

I am going to improve the science behind solar cells. It seems to skip over the science and just talk about efficiency and cost, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photovoltaic_cells

I am going to simplify some of the terms in here and add some new information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell

I am going to simplify the science in the following article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofuels

Thanks,

Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah.dimich (talk • contribs) 03:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Corrections Made

Hey Seth,

I found a few articles that had some grammatical or spelling errors and made some minor corrections. Thanks for your time.

-Matthew (Mlacount82891 (talk) 03:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Assignment 3

I have found some articles that could use some attention: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faradaic_current This section seemed a bit short. I think a little more information is needed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_notation This section also seemed short and what was included needed to be dumbed down a bit for those who didn't have much science background. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biophotovoltaic This article is only two sentences. Elaboration is definitely required. A picture or diagram would be nice, too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrocapillarity Fairly short article with a lot of technical information. Maybe a rewrite could include a little more for the less informed reader. Nightingale8283 (talk) 03:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some Suggested Pages for Improvement - Assignment #3

Kirwan Fox found some pages which could use some improvement.

Pages missing information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-reaction
This is only a brief description of what a half-reaction is, and is not nearly adequate even for a layman
to understand it. There is no explanation of any of the myriad of uses of the half-reaction in chemistry, or what is happening
to electrons during oxidation or reduction, or how to identify the differences.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_battery
This is not so much a problem with a page, but a suggestion to add this page to the battery types category.
There are quite a few historical references to early batteries in the battery types category. While it is true there
is disagreement about whether this is really the first galvanic cell predating our modern versions by a 1000 years, it
is important to point out this is an ancient device which had that capability, though it's real use cannot be confirmed.
EDIT - just noticed a reference to this on the galvanic cell page. That might be enough.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_energy_conversion
This is an incredibly short inadequate page which even teases the reader with how important this is to new automotive technology.
Expansion badly needed!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drew.P.Branch (talk • contribs) 06:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pages utilizing terminology a bit too technical
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemiluminescence
I really had a hard time understanding some of the terms on this page.
It is really too short to be a technical article, rather it should be simplified a bit for the layman.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protonic_ceramic_fuel_cell
I thought this page didn't have very clear explanations.
There are quite a few acronyms which could be expanded to include either links to description pages,
or explanations of what they mean.

Drew.P.Branch (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will's Assignment #3

Hi Seth,

For my third assignment, I was going to modify the following articles:

Electrochemical cell is a very short page. I feel that I could add new information (including some example reactions), along with modifying the somewhat wordy language.

Chemical energy is another VERY short page. It seems to me that they may be trying to explain the ΔG° concept we've been discussing in class, however I may be interpreting the term "chemical energy" incorrectly.

Spontaneous reaction starts off sounding very confusing to a person seeking general knowledge. The overview seems a little more well-written. I would like to focus on cleaning up the introduction.

Saturation (chemistry) is very short and seems to assume quite a bit of chemistry/science knowledge on the reader's part. I would like to explain some of the chemistry terms in more plain language.

Willdogg698 (talk) 05:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Assignment #3

Hi Dr. Anthony,

I have found four articles/pages that I reckon could use some fixing.

1) "Solar panels on spacecraft". This article seems like it should be addressed to a general audience, but it seems still to have some rather technical words that I do not understand. For example, 'figure of merit', and 'telemetry'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_panels_on_spacecraft

2) The page "Electrochemical gradient", could be written to a more general audience if the terms were more broadly defined. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_gradient

3) The "Faraday's constant" page was a bit short. It seems like there could be more said about the electric charge per mole of electrons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_constant

4) The page, "Polarization (electrochemistry)", is confusing to the lay person (a.k.a., me). An equation or some diagram would help the concept be more easily understood. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_%28electrochemistry%29

Thanks!

Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heleniliff (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #3 for Kristagoit (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello!

Here are my two articles that are short or absent:

There is little data on half reactions, and it does not come up automatically when searched for in the Wikipedia bar.

Laws of Thermodynamics -> History

The history aspect of the laws of thermodynamics is barely touched upon and could be expanded upon.

These are my two articles that are too technical:

Flow Battery -> Cases of Flow Batteries

This part of the article is especially technical, assuming the reader has previous knowledge on electrochemistry basics.

Ions -> Chemistry

Most of this article would be difficult for a person with average intelligence of chemistry to understand.

Thanks! Kristagoit (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Vuong Assignment #3

Electrolysis The introductory definition is slightly technical and hard to understand without any chemistry knowledge. It also could be more specific on the useful applications of electrolysis instead of only listing ores in the introduction.

Electroosmotic pump The information given is hard to understand, a section with less jargon should be included.

Magnesium-air fuel cell lacks anything more than a general sentence. Needs to have further elaboration.

Potassium-ion battery The information is general, there should be a section on applications and installations and a more specific description of the chemical process. KVuong (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles that need work

Rechargeable Battery - Section on damage to cells over time doesn't explain reason.

Oxidation - Etymology section is a little confusing when mentioning "hydrogenation."

Ion - A memory aide section would be helpful in remembering the difference between cations and anions.

Electropositivity - Little information is given and more would be helpful.

Thanks Seth,

Kaleb T. Kaleb.LT (talk) 05:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power

For this section there is a lot of differnet options for power. Adding a link for Power (chemistry) and placing some of what we have done could help this page. It seems like someone would have to look through a lot to get what we are looking for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage

In the definition it has in words "Voltage is electric potential energy per unit charge, measured in joules per coulomb ( = volts)". I think this would be more helpful if this was more visual. (Volts=Joules/Coulombs) bolded and by itself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_current

In our notes we show that "Current:(Amperes=Coulombs/Second)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_bridge This seems that they are only saying two items could create a salt bring. It also doesn't give a good disscprition about the process. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitts0608 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 3

Hi Seth, here are some articles I found that need some work:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmotic_power#Efficiency This article explained what Osmotic Power was well but lacked information on the efficiency of using Osmotic Power, kind of like a "benefits" section per se.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrode This article was surprisingly short, and has the basics of what an electrode is, but lacks information on the specifics of how they work.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equilibrium_constant The article gives a brief overview of what the equilibrium constant K that might sound too technical for those who have not studied the subject as of yet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_current One sentence that says "An ion current is the influx and/or efflux of ions through an ion channel."

Clee845 (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Lutz

Created the user account for wikipedia.

Xlutzsethx (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have now editied 3 articles for minor errors.

Xlutzsethx (talk) 17:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #4

Hi Seth, I have written some proposed changes to the half-reaction page. They are in my sandbox. FYI, the original page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-reaction

Drew.P.Branch (talk) 04:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth

Hey Seth, Just wanted to let you know that I just finished Wiki assignment #4 and have made some proposed changes for you to review. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Benjamin — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeatlesFan65 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 4

Hey Seth, I have edited my article. Let me know if I need to make any changes. Thanks! "Dsports1 (talk) 02:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)"[reply]

Assignment #4 Done

Hey Seth,

I got assignment #4 done. There was a reference error in the stuff I copied over, that I don't know how to fix. I just didn't worry about it sense it was not in my new text.

Thanks, Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah.dimich (talk • contribs) 02:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 4

Hey Seth, Finished up assignment 4, and am awaiting review. Nightingale8283 (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth, Just finished Assignment 4 and thanks for the help yesterday Tree19 (talk) 21:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assign 4

Just finished up with Assignment 4 if I did it correctly! Thanks! Kristagoit (talk) 06:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 4

Dr. Anthony, Assignment four is ready for your review. I summarized the introduction in what I feel is easier to understand lingo, and I added in a definition (electroactive species). I did my best to cite it, although I am not sure I did the citation "correctly". I couldn't figure out the automatic insert citation thing, so I just copied the markup of other users. One other thing: I did not know to save the original page in my sandbox before I edited it. The version in my sandbox is not the same as the version on the actual wikipedia article, and cannot be directly compared from my sandbox. Sorry! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:REEstudent/sandbox REEstudent (talk) 04:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Assignment #4

Hi Dr. Anthony,

I decided to edit the section called "Reducing Agent". I copied below the changes that I made. I am open to any suggestions!

Importance of reducing and oxidizing agents

Reducing agents and oxidizing agents are the ones responsible for corrosion, which is the “degradation of a solid, usually a metal, as a result of electrochemical activity”.^[1] The word corrosion comes from the Latin word, corrodere, which literally means "to gnaw away". Corrosion requires an negative electrodeanode, and a positive electrode cathode, to take place. The anode is an element that loses electrons (reducing agent), thus oxidation always occurs in the anode, and the cathode is an element that gains electrons (oxidizing agent), thus reduction always occurs in the cathode. This process can be used in electrolysis to generate electricity. Corrosion occurs whenever there’s a difference in oxidation potential. When there is an oxidation potential, the anode metal begins deteriorating, given there is an electrical connection and the presence of an electrolyte.

Thanks!

Helen Allen CHE 260

Assignment #4 complete!

My sandbox is ready for review just a day late and a dollar short!Michael.weeks (talk) 03:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #3 and #4

Hey Seth here are my articles for assignment # 3

Electrochemical Cells could use some more information and lacks depth.

Half-cell Is another article that is really short and could use more information.

Lithium-ion battery is an article that could be simplified in some parts. The introduction is a little vocab intensive.

Electrolytic Cell Is another article that could be simplified due to some of its technical content.

For assignment # 4, I chose to edit the Half-Cell article and add what I thought to be more usefull information in understanding what a Half-cell is.

Thanks for your time, hope you have a great time in Arizona -Matthew LaCount Mlacount82891 (talk) 05:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this is late but I have created my user page.

Zjmiller26 (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment Number 2

I finally finished it! I edited the grammar on the Géza, royal prince of Hungary page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 04:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell - could use some examples, the article is kind of short , I figured I could add some examples to make it easier to understand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-reaction - this article is very very short and I think it could use some more explanation about what half deacons are.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis - could be made easier to understand for those without much chemistry information. Change some sentences to make it easier to understand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_reaction - it was quickly evident this was going to be a fun read, it could be worded to be more gauged for the casual reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 05:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #4

Original Post

The key process of electrolysis is the interchange of atoms and ions by the removal or addition of electrons from the external circuit. The desired products of electrolysis are often in a different physical state from the electrolyte and can be removed by some physical processes. For example, in the electrolysis of brine to produce hydrogen and chlorine, the products are gaseous. These gaseous products bubble from the electrolyte and are collected.^[2]

Revised Post

The key process of electrolysis is the interchange of atoms and ions by the removal or addition of electrons from the external circuit. The process requires that an electrolyte, an ionized solution or salt, completes a circuit between two electrodes. The cathode and the anode. Reduction always occurs at the cathode while oxidation always occurs at the anode. The desired products of electrolysis are often in a different physical state from the electrolyte and can be removed by some physical processes. For example, in the electrolysis of brine to produce hydrogen and chlorine, the products are gaseous. These gaseous products bubble from the electrolyte and are collected.(Disassociated hydrogen ions gain an electron at the cathode and pair off to become hydrogen gas, and chlorine ions are attracted to the anode where they lose an electron, become chlorine atoms, pair off, and become chlorine gas) ^[2]

KVuong (talk) 17:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #5 completed

User:Heleniliff/sandbox Michael.weeks (talk) 21:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #4

Hey Seth, just finished some edits, they're in my sandbox. Heres the original page:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis

Sorry for the wait! Kaleb.LT (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 5

Seth,

I have completed assignment #5. I left comments on the person's talk page. Let me know if this does not work out. Thank you. (Dsports1 (talk) 01:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Assignment #5

Hey Seth:

I am letting you know that I just did Assingment #5. Hopefully its what you are looking for. I also left this information on the person's sandbox page so that they could see it in hopes it would help them make a better page:

"Hey, this is very well done! I really like how you explained terms clearly. I feel that you explained this so well that someone with a very limited understanding of chemistry could follow and understand this text. One suggestion that I would make would be maybe include units and also to maybe include real world examples of how these are used. Overall, Great job! It is very thorough."

-Alex Reese — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander.reese (talk • contribs) 02:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #5

Hey Seth,

Just wanted to let you know that I got assignment #5 done.

Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah.dimich (talk • contribs) 03:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #4

Hi Seth I've done some revisions for assignment number 4. Right on time.

Chris Lee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clee845 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #5

Hey Seth, just finished assignment 5.

Kaleb.LT (talk) 05:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #5 Part two

Hey Seth:

I just am letting you know that I just finished the second part of Assignment #5 Part two. This is what I said:

"Great Job! I really liked how thorough you are I your explanation. It is very easy to follow along, even for someone with a limited knowledge of chemistry. I feel that with these edits the article is much stronger and easier to understand. The only suggestion that I could make would be to include a mnemonic method for remembering that the oxidation occurs in the anode, while reduction occurs in the cathode. One example would be “AN OX and a RED CAT.” Then, obviously, you would have to explain how this is a good way of remembering."

Hope this is what you are looking for. Thanks!

-Alex Reese Alexander.reese (talk) 22:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

assignment

Hey Seth, sorry this is so late. Celilo.nordal (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

second assignment

I have just completed the second assignment, which was editing three articles slightly. I edited McCain foods, citlalicue, and a norwegian financial article that i can't remember Celilo.nordal (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

assignment 3

the articles I saw that could be edited are: fluid theory of electricity. this is a very short, un-cited article. electrochemical cell. This is also un-cited, but it is slightly longer. It could use a little editing and some more information, but for the most part it's fine. electrostatics. This article was too scientific. it used equations without explaining where it got the first. electrical work. this article also used a lot of equations without telling you what they were. I'd recommend simplifying them. Celilo.nordal (talk) 17:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dropping By

Made a page. Working on the Wikissignments currently. I'll keep you posted.

Greg G Robinson263 (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #5 - Flow Battery - Edit

Finished #5 Part 1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 22:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikissignment #2

Hello Seth!

Made edits to the Wooly Mammoth article and the Blacktail Deer article.

G Robinson263 (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #4 - Finished

I had some trouble figuring out the wiki super and subscript thing, but I found it and added some half-reactions in acidic and basic conditions to the half-reaction page. The changes are in my sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 23:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 5

Latest assignment finished awaiting the next directive Tree19 (talk) 04:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, I have finished the reviews for Wikipedia assignment #5. --REEstudent (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finished the second review. Tree19 (talk) 22:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of the salt bridge in electrochemical cell:

Purpose of the salt bridge in electrochemical cell:

The salt bridge transfers electrons from the anode to cathode electrode to balance the charge of both electrochemical cells. Without the salt bridge there would be a surplus of positive charge stockpile at the anode and a surplus of negative stockpile at the cathode. Without the flow of electrons the reactions would stop the current to flow.

As electrons leave one half of a galvanic cell and flow to the other, a difference in charge is established. If no salt bridge were used, this charge difference would prevent further flow of electrons. A salt bridge allows the flow of ions to maintain a balance in charge between the oxidation and reduction vessels while keeping the contents of each separate. With the charge difference balanced, electrons can flow once again, and the reduction and oxidation reactions can proceed. In general, keeping the two cells separate is preferable from the point of view of eliminating variables from an experiment. When no direct contact between electrolytes is allowed, there is no need to make allowance for possible interactions between ionic species.

The technique more specifically allows freedom in the choice of ions in solution. For instance, a mixture of two different cations in solution might result in the preferential reduction of the wrong one, for the purposes of the experiment. With a salt bridge, the desired cation (positive) species is isolated in one vessel while the cation in the other vessel may be chosen to make the experiment easier, such as using a more soluble, or more stable salt of the anionic (negative) species.

If the two vessels are entirely disconnected, without a salt bridge, then the cation and anion species are also isolated, but then each species quickly reaches equilibrium because no electrical current can flow. The salt bridge can be seen as a way of completing the ionic circuit without letting the solutions intermix.

Assingments 4 and 5

Hey Seth, i just finished my assingment 4. I made changes to the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxidation . Here is the link to my sand box, not sure how else to show you my changes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:OITowl3/sandbox . I have also looked at and commented on your reqested article for assingment 5. OITowl3 (talk) 04:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 4

Ok here is the page I used http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell, and I edited the intro part. Here is the link to my sandbox I guess? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xlutzsethx/sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xlutzsethx (talk • contribs) 21:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #6 - The edits have gone live.

I reviewed my edits/additions and have taken them live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 04:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chris B: Assignment 3

Wiki assignment 3 Seth, hopefully these will work.

The first two articles seem to miss the mark, on important an element (or elements)

Critique #1, title: “Electrochemistry” (link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry) Missing Content—no link to PV Cells—really??! There is a link to semiconductors which is in the same area, but PV should be linked as well.

Critique #2, Article: “Semiconductor” (link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor)

“The conductivity of a semiconductor increases with increasing temperature, behavior opposite to that of a metal.[1] ” [This statement is true when referencing a solid piece of metal, say a metal bar, or continuous length of wire; however, it often falls by the wayside when the conductor is an element in a circuit that includes a reactive load such as an AC motor. A reference to a related article would be helpful.]

The articles below are burdensome, more for excessive verbiage, than for being overly technical—although that could exists as well.

Critique #3, title: “Electrical Conductor” (link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_conductor)

Overburdened with verbiage as shown by the first sentence, of the first paragraph: [In physics and electrical engineering, [cap]a conductor is an object or type of material which permits the flow of electric charges in one or more directions.]

Critique #4, title: “Fuel Cell” link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell)

This article is very “wordy” for general consumption. If written more in the style of technical writing (minimizing unhelpful or unnecessary words) I think it would be more consumable. A fuel cell is a device that converts the chemical energy from a fuel into electricity through [by reacting it] chemical reaction with oxygen or another oxidizing[er] agent.[1] ChrisB WIGEfan (talk) 00:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Assignment #5

Hi Dr. Anthony!

I am writing to let you know that I made suggestions to Tree19 on June 3rd.

Kind Regards,

Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heleniliff (talk • contribs) 22:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 5 and 6 complete - (I think)

Seth, I have suggested some a few improvements to the proposed edits of one other user, User:Nightingale8283/sandbox Also, I have incorporated the suggestions made to me regarding my proposed edits, and gone live with them. Do I need to do one other review?

By the way, someone else had modified the page I intended to edit, but I think my edits still made sense so I did them anyway.

Drew.P.Branch (talk) 04:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greg R: Assignment 3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell

For such an important part of electrochemistry, this article seems pretty short, especially in the cell potential section.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_%28electricity%29#Primary_battery_chemistries

The section on primary battery chemistry (particularly the "elaboration" subsection) is not proportional to the amount of information provided in the secondary battery chemistry comments.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_effect

I feel like "temperature controllers" in the opening paragraph should be linked so that one may view the different types of controllers or even find out what temperature controllers are if it is not known.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_reaction#Nernst_equation

The section on electrolysis of aqueous solutions is only one sentence and rather vague. I could definitely be explained better.

G Robinson263 (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greg R: Assignment 5

Finished! Posted comments on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wallace.miller/sandbox

G Robinson263 (talk) 00:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

assignment 6

Hey Seth just finished taking my edits live for assignment 6. OITowl3 (talk) 01:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 6

Hey Seth, I just went live with my edits. Dsports1 (talk) 05:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 5 pt2/ 6

Hey Seth, just finished my second review for assignment 5 and posted my edits for assignment 6. The page I edited was electrolysis. Thanks for another excellent term, have a good summer? Kaleb.LT (talk) 20:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Took my edits live, enjoy your summer. Tree19 (talk) 00:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 6

Dr. Anthony, I just finished posting my edits on the flow battery page. Thanks so much for a great term! I hope you have a wonderful summer! REEstudent (talk) 22:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #6

Hey Seth,

I just took my edits live. Have a great summer!

Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah.dimich (talk • contribs) 01:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 6: edits are live!

Hey Seth, my edits are now live and assignment 6 is complete. Nightingale8283 (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipidia Assignment #6

Hi Dr. Anthony! I posted my edits live!!! Have a great summer!!! Kind Regards, Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heleniliff (talk • contribs) 19:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbara Howe

The article Barbara Howe has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ddcm8991 (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

South carolina congressional district map

THe congressional district map for south carolina is outdated - there are 7 districts in the 113th congress now.

example here: http://www.wrhammons.com/southcarolina-congressional-districts.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.109.141 (talk) 21:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bill Fletcher

The article Bill Fletcher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 23:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ronald T. Kadish.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ronald T. Kadish.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BriggsdaleCOChurch.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:CarrCOPostOffice.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:ColoradoHighway14Weld.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Bailey (U.S. politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Bailey (U.S. politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Bailey (U.S. politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 22:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of And Now for a Word for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article And Now for a Word is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/And Now for a Word until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A Race Through Dark Places for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Race Through Dark Places is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Race Through Dark Places until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Revelations (Babylon 5) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revelations (Babylon 5) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revelations (Babylon 5) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Confessions and Lamentations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Confessions and Lamentations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confessions and Lamentations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grey 17 Is Missing

The article Grey 17 Is Missing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable by itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Guye (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Into the Fire (Babylon 5)

The article Into the Fire (Babylon 5) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fancrufty unnoteworthy episode

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Guye (talk) 10:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the Great Colorado Wiknic 2015

The Great Colorado Wiknic 2015

Who: All Wikipedia and Wikimedia users in Colorado and their families are invited. New users are specifically encouraged to attend.

What: The Great Colorado Wiknic 2015.

When: Sunday afternoon, July 5, 2015, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our Attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Your hosts: Buaidh and BikeSally 15:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)

how did you post this picture?

of Nick Berg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.41.0 (talk) 09:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiknic

Don't forget the Colorado Wiknic this Sunday afternoon. We hope to see you there. Buaidh 16:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you participated in the Sedna discussion

Minor planet 90377 Sedna > Sedna (minor planet) discussion taking place at Talk:90377_Sedna#Odd_name. Please join in if it catches your fancy. A previous discussion took place with a result of Sedna (planetoid) which is why you are on this list. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ernest West Basden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernest West Basden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest West Basden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 00:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the Great Colorado Wiknic

The Great Colorado Wiknic 2016

Who: All Wikipedia and Wikimedia users and their families and friends are invited.

What: The Great Colorado Wiknic 2016.

When: Sunday afternoon, June 26, 2015, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive e-mail notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Sponsor: WikiProject Colorado

Your hosts: Buaidh & BikeSally
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)

Colorado Wiknic rescheduled to August 7

See details at Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Wiknic/2016, the June date has been postponed.--Pharos (talk) 08:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rescheduled Colorado Wiknic

The Great Colorado Wiknic 2016 has been rescheduled from June 26 to August 7 due to a conflict with Wikimania 2016. My apologies for the inconvenience. I hope you can join us on Sunday afternoon, August 7. Yours aye, Buaidh 21:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado Wiknic

The Great Colorado Wiknic 2016

Who: All Wikipedia and Wikimedia users and their families and friends are invited.

What: The Great Colorado Wiknic 2016.

When: Sunday afternoon, August 7, 2015, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive e-mail notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Sponsor: WikiProject Colorado

Your hosts: Buaidh & BikeSally
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)

Delivered:01:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Caroline Island aka Millenium

Your article has a point that I believe needs correction, i.e. the "ownership changed" also, there is room for updating of the changes since Felix U. occupied an islet and exploited the Clams and Coconut crabs. Capt. Omar Darr, as explained in "Together Alone" held a lease and sublet that lease to the Falconers, on the understanding that there would be a renewal to himself which he would pass on the family in due course. The lease was then offered to the businessman, but it became obvious that he was not conservation minded and the lease was withdrawn. The person who has done a lot of the work to keep this atoll pristine visited there with the Govt. officials for the Year 2000 celebrations and pressed to them the need for conservation and not the blatant exploitation that had occurred since the Falconers left. She lives in Hawaii now, and Ron Falconer moved to Moorea, his wife, and children, eventually returned to France. I notice that someone had admitted to living there - there was an American who sailed there and stayed at the Falconer homesite for a period in the 1990s, and a Frenchman in this decade. Fiona ML1 (talk) 10:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Sethant. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Sethant.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sethant. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to the Seventh Annual Colorado Wiknic

The Great Colorado Wiknic 2017

Who: All Wikipedia and other Wikimedia users and their families and friends are invited.

What: The Seventh Annual Colorado Wiknic.

When: Sunday afternoon, June 25, 2017, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive e-mail notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Sponsors: The Wikimedians of Colorado & WikiProject Colorado

Your hosts: Buaidh & BikeSally
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)
Message sent: 00:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (March equinox) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating March equinox, Sethant!

Wikipedia editor Kvng just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

revert

To reply, leave a comment on Kvng's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

~Kvng (talk) 02:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blaster (weapon) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blaster (weapon). Since you had some involvement with the Blaster (weapon) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sethant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Debbie Marquez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debbie Marquez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debbie Marquez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 04:27, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eighth Annual Colorado Wiknic

Colorado Wiknic 2018

Who: All Wikipedia and Wikimedia users and their families and friends are cordially invited.

What: The Eighth Annual Colorado Wiknic.

When: Sunday afternoon, July 15, 2018, from 12:00 noon to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive e-mail notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Sponsors: The Wikimedians of Colorado & WikiProject Colorado

Your hosts: Buaidh & BikeSally
(Delivered: 12:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Trauner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Trauner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Trauner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:07, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need a map

Normally, I use a map for a nearby location. There is not one in this case. Dennis, North Carolina needs a map. How do I get one?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marla Dorrel

The article Marla Dorrel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPOL - certainly not a big enough town to grant a presumption of notability to council members.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:37, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marla Dorrel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marla Dorrel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marla Dorrel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Julie Aberg Robison for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julie Aberg Robison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Aberg Robison (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sethant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak
Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean-François Clervoy

The article Jean-François Clervoy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:50, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to the Ninth Annual Colorado Wiknic

Colorado Wiknic 2019

Who: All Wikipedia users and their families and friends are cordially invited.

What: The Ninth Annual Colorado Wiknic.

When: Sunday afternoon, July 14, 2019, from 12:00 noon to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive e-mail notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Sponsors: The Wikimedians of Colorado and WikiProject Colorado

Your hosts: Buaidh & BikeSally We hope to see you.
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)
PS: The Colorado portal has been nominated for deletion. You may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#Portal:Colorado.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The future of Portal:Colorado

On June 25, 2019, Portal:Colorado was nominated for deletion. (Please see discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Colorado.) We have upgraded the portal and added several new features including selected Colorado articles, biographies, and images. If you believe the Colorado portal is valuable to Wikipedia, please help us upgrade and maintain the portal. Add your suggestions for improvement to Portal talk:Colorado. You may nominate additions at:

Yours aye, Buaidh talk contribs 17:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Colorado at 17:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notifications, please remove your username from the mailing list.[reply]

Dunbar, South Carolina

How does the red dot get put in the correct location? The new article has coordinates.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Cite error: The named reference sfe was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ ^a ^b R. J. D. Tilley (2004). Understanding solids: the science of materials. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 281–. ISBN 978-0-470-85276-7. Retrieved 22 October 2011.

Nomination of List of people involved with Babylon 5 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people involved with Babylon 5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people involved with Babylon 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – sgeureka ^t•c 11:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Index of Babylon 5 articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Index of Babylon 5 articles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Babylon 5 articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – sgeureka ^t•c 14:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Index of Babylon 5 articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Index of Babylon 5 articles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Babylon 5 articles (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – sgeureka ^t•c 09:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to Seth Anthony

Just wondered why you chose to pinpoint Mooresboro, North Carolina, as it is such a small place. My family history ties to Mooresboro (my people were NC pioneers from 1700's here. I like your Profile Wikipage! You seem like a very interesting person! LisaRudisill (talk) 12:45, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Lisa Rudisill, M.T.S. NC[reply]

Nomination of Mannie Rodriguez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mannie Rodriguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannie Rodriguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 13:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Caroline Island

I have nominated Caroline Island for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 03:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sethant, I'm currently doing some work on the article to help it from being declassified as an FA. At present I'm looking at the references, any objections if I change them so that I use the Harvard style (see WP:CITESHORT)? Amitchell125 (talk) 11:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Amitchell125, No objection whatsoever! -- Sethant (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"I-15" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect I-15. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 23#I-15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Colorado House career of Douglas Bruce for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colorado House career of Douglas Bruce, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colorado House career of Douglas Bruce until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion of 2002 North Carolina General Assembly election

I noticed that you are the original contributor to this page and I am notifying you of the proposed deletion I made because after my recent contributions to the 2002 North Carolina Senate election & 2002 North Carolina House of Representatives election that make your article outdated. BrendanM127 (talk) 00:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2002 North Carolina General Assembly election

The article 2002 North Carolina General Assembly election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

In addition to not citing any sources, This article is in-extensive and most of the information it covers is already on the pages 2002 North Carolina Senate election and 2002 North Carolina House of Representatives election

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

WikiProject Colorado Zoom meeting 05/12/2021

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold a Zoom meeting at 7:30 PM MDT on Wednesday, May 12, 2021, for those interested in working on Colorado Wikipedia articles. Your suggestions and comments are appreciated. Information about some of the things we need to do is located at Colorado things to do and Requested Colorado articles.

Topic: WikiProject Colorado May 2021
Time: May 12, 2021 07:30 PM MDT

Join Zoom Meeting https://us04web.zoom.us/j/78055623422?pwd=VUtPQVZrZzU1ZWVhZ0F1MExIeUQ2UT09

Meeting ID: 780 5562 3422
Passcode: WP:CO MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Colorado Legislation

Template:Infobox Colorado Legislation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. - - mathmitch7 ^{(talk/contribs)} 12:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Colorado Summer Zoom Meeting

WikiProject
Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold a brief online meeting at 7:30 PM MDT on Tuesday, August 10, 2021. See what your fellow users have been up to and share your interests and suggestions. Some requests are listed at Colorado things to do and Requested Colorado articles.

Topic: WikiProject Colorado Summer Zoom Meeting
Time: August 10, 2021 07:30 PM MDT

Join Zoom Meeting https://us04web.zoom.us/j/74506020308?pwd=eTFPSlkzOUg0bTE2SVdXUnl2SVY4Zz09

Meeting ID: 745 0602 0308
Passcode: Colorado

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

2020 United States Census for Colorado

WikiProject
Colorado

I've posted the results of the 2020 United States Census for Colorado at Wikipedia:WikiProject Colorado/2020 Census. You may wish to update your existing Colorado articles with this data.

Yours aye, Buaidh talk e-mail 04:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Colorado at 11:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Brief online meeting of WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject
Colorado

What's up with Wikipedia and WikiProjectColorado? Join us for a brief online meeting at 7:30 PM MDT Tuesday evening, November 9, 2021 at https://meet.google.com/wyz-dfek-fdp

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 02/08/2022

WikiProject
Colorado

What's up with Wikipedia and WikiProject Colorado? Join us for an online meeting from 7:30 to 8:30 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 8, 2022, at meet.google.com/ksx-wksh-eba

If you don't want to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For creating many fine articles on Wikipedia, such as Eleanor Kinnaird. I hope you are back soon. Otherwise, accept this as a token of delayed appreciation. gidonb (talk) 16:47, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

The Ant

Nice to meet another Ogden Nash fan. You might also like wp:The Parable of the Ants. Andrewa (talk) 18:24, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 05/17/2022

WikiProject
Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold a short online meeting from 7:30 to 8:30 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 17, 2022, at meet.google.com/zwd-ojag-enp

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 08/16/2022

WikiProject
Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 16, 2022, at meet.google.com/bqn-jhaw-ewc. Anyone interested in Colorado is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

Thank you for Caroline Island, a 2006 beauty revived. Thanks also to all who helped with the revival. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Carolina and Colorado

Thank you for quality articles such as Caroline Island, for Colorado legislators such as Don Marostica, John Kefalas and Ellen Roberts, for series such as cardinal electors and members of the North Carolina General Assembly, for "And thanks for your improvements to the article as well!", - Seth, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2757 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 11/15/2022

WikiProject
Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 15, 2022, at meet.google.com/yoe-aphc-wey. Anyone interested in Colorado articles, history, or photographs is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 01:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado Collaboration invitation

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado invites you to participate in our current collaboration to locate and document the following two original 1861 Colorado Territory county seats:

Parkville, Colorado, the original county seat of Summit County, Colorado.
San Miguel, Colorado, the original county seat of Costilla County, Colorado.

If you have any questions, please contact User:Buaidh (talk or e-mail).

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado collaboration

WikiProject Colorado

We wish to thank everyone who contributed to our two prior Colorado collaborations to document the Amache National Historic Site and our three lost original county seats of Parkville, St. Vrain, and San Miguel. We invite you to help with our new collaboration to document the seven following former county seats:

California Ranch, Colorado near Franktown – Douglas County seat 1864 to 1874
Dayton, Colorado near Twin Lakes – Lake County seat 1866 to 1868
Hahns Peak, Colorado – Routt County seat 1878 to 1912
Lourette, Colorado – Lake County seat 1863 to 1866
San Juan City, Colorado – Hinsdale County seat February 10, 1874 to 1875
Ula, Colorado at 38°09′00″N 105°30′07″W / 38.1500°N 105.5019°W / 38.1500; -105.5019 – Custer County seat March 9, 1877 to 1878
Wason, Colorado near 37°53′35″N 106°50′34″W / 37.8931°N 106.8428°W / 37.8931; -106.8428 – Mineral County seat March 27, 1893 to 1893

If you have any questions, please contact Buaidh talk e-mail

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 08/08/2023

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 8, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in articles, history, geography, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We may try to organize one or more Wiknics. Guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

US Mountain West online meeting November 14

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Denver gathering

WikiProject Colorado

We will hold a casual Wikipedia gathering at the Gonzales Library at 1498 North Irving Street in Denver, on Sunday afternoon, February 11, 2024, from 2:30 to 4:00 PM MST. See details at Wikipedia:Meetup/Denver#February 11, 2024: Denver, Colorado Wiki Meetup.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Joe Rice

Joe Rice has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN archives

Hi. I hope you are doing well. I am glad to tell you that Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives are now fully available, with all the vandalism/disruptive edits removed. While creating the bot for the archival process, I went through a lot of the older posts, you are one of the editors whose name popped quite often in ITN in "back in the day", so I personally wanted to let you know about the archives its nice to see that you are still active! —usernamekiran (talk) 22:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Ellen Roberts

Ellen Roberts has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sethant&oldid=1254245705"

Hidden categories: