Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muid latif
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 14:18, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-encyclopedic prose, likely vanity Zocky 01:51, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that people commonly leave these in good faith, and sometimes they even turn out to be encyclopaedic. Other times, they're a work of a newbie who hasn't yet grasped the Wikipedia concept fully. No need for snide remarks. Zocky 21:39, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Vanity, not notable. 129 Google hits Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:33, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. If it isn't a vanity page, it sounds like advertising. It goes either way. --Mitsukai 03:25, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, vanity. Megan1967 04:10, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's advertising, nothing more. Jamyskis 14:05, 11 May 2005 (GMT)
- Delete as advertising. — JIP | Talk 13:09, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wow - self-taught dancer... so am I, and I don't have an article. -- BDAbramson thimk 14:33, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
- Delete. not notable persona. --metta, The Sunborn 16:01, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- vanity. - Longhair | Talk 21:54, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--Bhadani 07:17, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity. Tomer TALK 18:10, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.