User talk:Shannonr

Hi! I entreat you to communicate with me using the simple guideline that I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. This means that, in general, unless there's a good reason (or you specifically request otherwise):

If I post on your talk page, I will notice any replies posted there, and respond there.
If you post here, I will reply here.

Also, please try for civility and attempt an assumption of good faith. Trolling and personal attacks are likely to be simply removed by me or by a bot overlord. I, for one, welcome our bot overlords! Visit the archives to see previous discussions, and please put new topics at the bottom. Thanks!

Stephen Fry

Hiya, I've reverted your edit to Stephen Fry, I don't think it was wrong so much as badly worded. What it's going for is that Fry played the historical character Charles I as a parody of the present Prince of Wales. Mallocks (talk) 11:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right. It wasn't a "strong satire" so I thought the sentence didn't deserve to be there -- but an edited version would make perfect sense. --Shannonr (talk) 11:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of the version I've proposed? --Shannonr (talk) 11:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it suits perfectly; nice one. Mallocks (talk) 12:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phalgun Mela in Khatushyamji

Hi Shannonr, please find the response at my talk page. Thanks, Shyam ^(T/C) 10:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See above. --Shannonr (talk) 10:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qadbros

No problem. :) That article had already been deleted once. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 07:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corridor of uncertainity

It would have been nice if one of them had put it in their autobiographies. I guess we cannot use it as a source for the article - the most that we can do probably is to reduce the certainty of Boycott's claim even further from the current "commonly credited" to something like "has claimed" and add Hughes in external links.

It notice that Boycott is the only reference for his claim. Does that make it a good reliable source ? Tintin 08:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. Reducing the certainty of the Boycott claim is probably the right move. One thing, though: Boycott is certainly not the only reference for his claim. It's in recorded commentary of the test cited (the first such instance), and there are many sports columns out their referencing that fact. --shannonr (talk) 23:20, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the change. Thoughts? --shannonr (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is fine in my opinion, but someone may complain that youtube is not valid source. It has happened in the past. Tintin 13:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo requests

Hey Shannon, do you do photo requests? If so, would you be willing to take a picture of the Air China headquarters in Shunyi District? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 09:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow it's been a long time since I've logged in! I notice that the Air China page still doesn't have a HQ shot, so next time I'm up in Shunyi, I'll try to get one. Thanks for the request! shannonr (talk) 15:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 13 October 2012
Last: 23 July 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:42, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shannonr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shannonr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Fair Use in Australia campaign update

I'm writing you this followup message, as you took the time to vote in support of a Wikipedia banner campaign for the introduction of Fair Use in Australia.

After much planning and coordination with the WMF, Australian Digital Alliance, and Electronic Frontiers Australia, as of Monday the banner-campaign is active on English Wikipedia to a portion of logged-out readers in Australia (technical details). The banners direct people to this page on Meta: FairCopyrightOz. That page, alongside lots of information, further directs people towards the campaign website faircopyright.org.au where Australians are invited to write to their local MP to express support of Fair Use. If you are interested in supporting this campaign, please, send a letter yourself using the template letter provided at that link.

Furthermore, and with the support of the ADA & EFA, we have received fantastic media coverage - with article "Fair Use: Wikipedia targets Australians in bid to change the law" appearing on page 2 of the Sydney Morning Herald and page 10 of the Melbourne Age on Monday's edition. It was for a time the 3rd most read article the Fairfax website, and Fair Use was "trending" on Twitter in Australia. We are running the account @FairCopyrightOz on twitter, and we are tracking other press-mentions on the talkpage on Meta.

Today, day 2, we published a detailed post about the campaign on the Wikimedia Blog, ran an "Ask Me Anything" Q&A session on the Australia page in Reddit, and [by happy coincidence of timing] the article History of fair use proposals in Australia appeared on the en.wp mainpage as a Did You Know. [The creation of that "history of..." article was a specific request arising from in the community consultation in which you voted].

And, most importantly, in a little more than a day nearly 800 letters to MPs have been sent encouraging them to support the Productivity Commission's recommendation to adopt Fair Use in Australia. I urge you - please add your own message.

Sincerely, Witty lama 16:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shannonr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shannonr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]