User talk:Tablizer

Data structures

I'm not sure what to think of the statement you added to data structure. To my mind, an abstract data structure describes an interface, while an ordinary data structure, such as a red-black tree, specifies a detailed design (if not the exact implementation). Would you agree with this? If so, maybe the article should say something to this effect. Derrick Coetzee 04:34, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I see the term as covering both. "Abstract data structure" is one kind, but there is no specific/simple term for implementation. -- user: tablizer

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Glad you decided to join us. Feel free to put {{user c2}} on your user page, as well as links to your stuff. --EngineerScotty 05:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Howdy, Top. — Hex (❝?!❞) 21:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Craig Stuntz 13:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RDBMS

No offense, but I removed all the stuff about dynamic relational. It's mostly worthless from the theoretical perspective (the purpose of this article), and it's uncited. WP:BOLD McKay 20:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Milky Way

Tablizer, I thought about providing a brightened, enhanced version myself, but assumed if somebody thought it would be useful they would make one of their own. I'm glad you did. When I have some time I'll make an enhanced version starting with the original RAW file, and we can decide then whether it's worth replacing my original or your edit with the new one.

I noticed the license tags on your version are missing, and took the liberty of tagging it for you. Derivatives of my original should be licensed according to the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 guidelines. If you have any questions or concerns about this please feel free to discuss it with me.

Thanks -- moondigger 02:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wattpad Book ButterflowerZ, Starlink 4110, starlink 1101. JDD Beautifuel Storm (talk) 00:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Collection Oriented Programming

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Collection Oriented Programming meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collection Oriented Programming. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. --Craig Stuntz 13:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Star Answer

I saw you asked a question about the sea star's defense. It actually, doesn't really have one. Luckily though, it has the ability to grow back its arms, but if the central area is destroyed, the sea star will unfortunately die. Brittle Stars, however, have a defense mechanism. They release one of their arms to distract the predators, while they getaway. They too can grow back arms. Hope that helps, it's very interesting! Shy1520 04:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Archimedes Heat Ray.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Archimedes Heat Ray.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 21:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/evolinks.htm

Is this your site. It is really good. Why no contact info on it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.109.234.155 (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

One word: Spam --Tablizer 05:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Mars first lander image.gif

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Mars first lander image.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Mars first lander image.gif is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Mars first lander image.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your intelligent design edit

Hello, I noticed you edited the Intelligent design article. However, it was reverted. I did not revert it, but noticed that it was reverted. This can be a frustrating experience for some. In any event, the best way to add content to articles is to read reliable sources, summarize what those sources say, and add the summary to the article along with a reference. TableManners^C·U·T 06:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:NGC_4526_Enhanced.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NGC_4526_Enhanced.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 16:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:NH_Jupiter_IR.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NH_Jupiter_IR.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 16:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

convert to SVG

Will you please use the program with which you made the image Sun Life.png to make a vectorial version, preferably SVG, and after making the new image page on wiki commons, use this tag on your old image page: Template:Vector_version_available. --DynV (talk) 17:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed usage

Hi, I saw you typed out <sub>[citation needed]</sub> for a citation needed tag. Just so you know, all you have to do is type {{cn}}. This use of this template (anything inside a set of {{}} brackets is a template) automatically alerts certain bots and pages that there is a citation needed on that page, so that eventually people can come and clean it up. Non-standard usage bypasses this automatic updating. Also, it's shorter to type. NJGW (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated WP:OR edits to Asteroids (video game)

While interesting observations, the edits you keep trying to put in to the Asteroids article are personal observations and constitute WP:OR. If you wish to discuss vector technology, you must use cited material that covers said subject, per Wikipedia guidelines. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 07:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viking1 surface.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Viking1 surface.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Van der Hoorn (talk) 14:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viking 1 Dunes.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Viking 1 Dunes.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Van der Hoorn (talk) 12:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Fan trek tres inter.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fan trek tres inter.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:57, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fan trek tres inter lowres.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fan trek tres inter lowres.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jupiter little red spot NH.png

Thank you for uploading File:Jupiter little red spot NH.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:20, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Milky way bw.gif

The file File:Milky way bw.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Io new horizons plum.png

The file File:Io new horizons plum.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]