Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Robertson
Appearance
This page appaears to be a non-notible vanity page. I was about to go and wikify it, but thought to run a short search through amazon and google for links to this person or his books and found neither. I recommend we delete this as a vanity page unless other evidence is found that it is not. -SocratesJedi 21:37, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I did some more googling, didn't find anything of note, though it doesn't help that his name is extremely common. Delete. Spangineer 00:01, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: If the article doesn't give us a way to verify (published in what journal?), and if this journalist (he's a journalist, so "author" is a little off the mark) isn't notable enough that he comes up on a Google search, then he's both not notable enough for an encyclopedia article and not verifiable. (The previous applies to living authors, obviously, and those who work in the public sphere. Google testing the French symbolist poet Laforgue wouldn't be appropriate.) Geogre 00:33, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:46, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. Wyss 20:18, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Abstaining for now. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 08:55, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Comment. The page is empty when I visited it. Enochlau 06:16, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)