Jump to content

Talk:Australia First Party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This article seems POV to me - anyone else? Especially lines like "The appearance of ‘Pauline Hanson’s One Nation’ (ON) in early 1997 had great potential for massive change in national politics." Moncrief 08:08, May 23, 2004 (UTC)

It's very strange but all I did was put brackets around "Australian House of Representatives" (it lacked one bracket), and somehow it showed up as all that editing. I may have (must have, I guess) clicked on an earlier version of the article somehow, because I don't know how that happened. I liked your edits very much, Adam. Moncrief 06:22, May 25, 2004 (UTC)

Does the earlier Australia First need a separate page? Harrypotter 23:41, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

David Palmer

[edit]

As much as it aggravates me to side with the likes of Saleam, the truth is a better policy than sensationalism. I would suggest taking that section from David Palmer as suspect. Palmer is a geriatric nut with an axe to grind about Saleam. Everybody wants to be the fuhror or something. His own claims about being the "Grand Wizard of the KKK" are held by the rest of the white supremacist community as laughable. He had his own group "Club Naziya" or something like that back in the day who where known for attempts at (I believe unsuccessful ) infiltrating Liberal party branches , and an attempt at taking over the Humanist Society ( https://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=10169 ). Palmer holds serious grudges against Saleam (partly from Saleams nonsensical claims not to be a neo-nazi, and partly from idiotic skinhead drama) and I'd highly doubt his claims to have "infiltrated" Australia First beyond a handful of elderly heil-hitler types joining. It just doesnt seem a significant or reliable fact. Duckmonster (talk) 00:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Media Smears

[edit]

The word "smears" seems to be very POV. Wouldn't "criticisms" or "reports" be more neutral?

Agreed. "Allegations" is a rather neutral word (if anything, it slightly suggests "unproven"), and is much more suitable. Smear is inherently POV and contains a claim about motives that is not currently supported.--Stephan Schulz 11:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

I'm adding an infobox to this and other minor Australian political party articles. If there is a reason they don't already have one, then my apologies (let me know and I can remove them myself so that no one else has to do all that work!). Frickeg 02:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The federaly registered parties are the only ones to have a info box on them okay comrade. --59.100.91.140 06:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Does this include previously registered parties, and how does one find out which ones are federally registered? Frickeg 07:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just go to the Australia Electoral Commissioin web site and they will tell you what parties are federal registered. --61.68.209.197 10:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But does it include previously registered parties? If it doesn't, even reasonably well-known minor parties like the Christian Democrats and One Nation would be denied infoboxes. Frickeg 02:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What does "anti-immigration/multiculturalism" mean?

[edit]

To me "anti-immigration/multiculturalism" is an oxymoron. Cultural and ethnic diversity without immigration? Ugh?

Monkeyblue 06:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

[edit]

User:LeoFrank: please explain how this violates WP:COPYVIO. That makes no sense to me. AEC is being used as reference here. Ground Zero | t 13:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Australia First Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Australia First Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australia First Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australia First Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Australia First Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Australia First

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge Bacondrum (talk) 00:52, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

<Start of discussion>

I propose merging Patriotic Youth League with Australia First Party. The group is literally a few Uni students. The parent group itself, Australia First Party, is barely note worthy enough for a page, it's youth wing is not notable by any standard. A few news articles about racist pamphlets (that they deny distributing?!?!) does not make them note worthy. If wikipedia had a page on every group of Uni students that stuck up a political poster there would literally be billions of them. Bacondrum (talk) 23:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bacondrum (talk • contribs) 23:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

<End of discussion>

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Formatting issues at top of article

[edit]

There's some information at the top of the article that's probably supposed to be in the textbox (? not sure what it's called, the thing to the top-right). I don't know how to do the edit myself, unfortunately.

Here's the text that's there right now:

| religion = | national = | regional = | continental = | international = | europarl = | affiliation1_title = | affiliation1 = | affiliation2_title = | affiliation2 = | colors =   Blue   Red   Black | slogan = "Identity. Independence. Freedom." | anthem = | seats1_title = House of Representatives

| seats1 =

0 / 151

| seats2_title = Senate

| seats2 =

0 / 76

| symbol = | flag = File:Eureka_Flag.svg | flag_title = Eureka flag | flag_alt = | website = australiafirstparty.net | country = Australia }} Neothix (talk) 08:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Australia_First_Party&oldid=1199197205"