Talk:Phonetics

A fact from Phonetics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 November 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Sanskrit grammarian Pāṇini provided a phonetic theory of voicing around 350 BCE?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Phonetics.

Wikipedia

Linguistics: Phonetics Top‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force (assessed as Top-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Browman, Catherine; Goldstein, Louis (1992). "Articulatory phonology: an overview" (PDF). Phonetica. 49 (3–4): 155–180. doi:10.1159/000261913.
An overview of gestural accounts of oral articulation.
Fant, Gunnar (2012). Acoustic Theory of Speech Production : With Calculations based on X-Ray Studies of Russian Articulations. DeGruyter. ISBN 9789027916006.
Source filter model of speech production
Arai, Takayuki (2004). "History of Chiba and Kajiyama and their influence in modern speech science". Proceedings of From Sound to Sense. 50: 115–120.
History of source filter theory
World Atlas of Language Structures
The entry on "Phonetics" in Brittanica is pretty good for summary style coverage of a lot of topics and can point to new sources as well. The Salem Press Encyclopedia has good historical coverage.
Sedivy, Julie (2019). Language in Mind: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). ISBN 978-1605357058.
Parrell, B; Lammert, A. C.; Ciccarelli, G.; Quatieri, T. F. (2019). "Current models of speech motor control: A control-theoretic overview of architectures and properties". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 145 (3): 1456–1481.

Comment: For access contact Wugapodes or ask at the resource exchange.

Archives (index)

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

New diagram

The recently added diagram of concentric circles with phonetics in the centre surely needs a citation to support it, or must otherwise be considered OR? RoachPeter (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, RoachPeter (talk · contribs)!

If you go to the image page on Wikimedia commons for File:Major levels of linguistic structure.svg, its source field cites the book it's from.

I was following the guidance on Wikipedia:Image_citation to only include the citation details of an image on the image's file page, rather than in the article itself.

Thanks!

Catleeball (talk) 02:43, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't know of that WP guidance. RoachPeter (talk) 09:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! :) Catleeball (talk) 00:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship between phonology and phonetics

@Nardog: I mean look at the very first image on this page (actually in the discussion section above too). Perhaps we can at least discuss the relationship between the two concepts; I'm aware the relationship can be fraught, but ignoring it altogether could mislead newcomers who don't know if they're really looking for one or the other. I can do some source digging to see what I'd find, if that'd help. Wolfdog (talk) 16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? That image is not claiming that phonetics is "sometimes considered a sub-branch within phonology", nor am I familiar with anyone taking such a position. Nardog (talk) 01:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the more I look at the image the weirder it seems! What's it's purpose?? Anyway, I'm fine with the amended hatnote now. Thanks. Sorry for the confusion; I was thinking of phonology versus phonemics (not phonetics) while half-distracted. Wolfdog (talk) 03:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]