Talk:Mars (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Astronomy: Mars / Solar System

	Astronomy portal This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
	This disambiguation page is supported by Mars task force.
	This disambiguation page is supported by Solar System task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Stadium Arcadium#Disc two: Mars|Stadium Arcadium]] The anchor (#Disc two: Mars) has been deleted by other users before.
[[List of Pokémon characters#Team Galactic|''Pokémon'' character]] The anchor (#Team Galactic) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Comments

There is a problem, I just made a page called Mars Incorporated (following an not existing link), but there is also a page called Mars, Incorporated, I see now. What is right?

They tend to use a comma in their www.mars.com website, so i've used this as the main one.

I've copied your page over and tried to integrate it, Mars, Incorporated. Tristanb 07:34 12 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Mars (planet) is being proposed to be moved to Mars, with reference to Mars (disambiguation) at the top. Any objections or comments should be listed on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Anthony DiPierro 18:05, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Common uses

In case anyone is wondering how I chose the entries for the common uses section, it's largely based on the page view statistics here: [1]. While page views shouldn't be the only thing considered, this is one of those cases where a few articles stand way out from the others and I also just didn't feel like anything important was being left out. If anyone thinks there's a glaring omission, please do make your case. -- Fyrael (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]