Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledgeplanet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. ugen64 04:13, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Vanity, advertising JeremyA 15:03, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- delete. vanity -- Aleph4 15:13, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Spam, copyvio, not notable, vanity, ... jni 15:49, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Updated. Neutral Definition, no copyvio ... JBI 16:30, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete one of thousands of training companies, is not notably different or more deserving of an article than any one of them--nixie 05:36, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. — Gwalla | Talk 02:47, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete. Perhaps not to you, cockroaches aren't notable to me but they have an entry and I'm not complaining. JBI 05:36, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Advertising. Articles about companies and products are fine if they are written in an objective and unbiased style and their subject is relevant enough to merit an article. External links to commercial organisations are acceptable if they can serve to identify major corporations associated with a topic (see finishing school for an example). Please note Wikipedia does not endorse any businesses and it does not set up affiliate programs. JBI 05:36, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.