Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloeburner
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 16:11, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
32 google hits. Non-notable vanity. jdb ❋ (talk) 07:22, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence that they are a noteworthy band. --Stormie 07:23, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 07:44, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Abstain Until a band has at least one hit recording, why are you even voting on this stuff? --Wetman 07:59, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, article fails to meet notability criteria at Notability and Music Guidelines --Allen3 12:18, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete with no evidence anyone else cares - David Gerard 11:16, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.