Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enjoy Incubus

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fron Cleanup since June 9. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. 03:00, Jul 26, 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete: It's an album. I know people write album articles. I don't think they ought to, unless it's a landmark album. This is not a landmark album. Geogre 03:06, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • Just to be clear for all those wanting to keep it, it's an ep. EP's are usually listed in the "singles" sections of discographies. Secondly, the article was on Clean Up since June 9th. Third, for being such a famous band (and it is), none of its fans improved it in that month. Fourth, although there are many, many album articles, previous mistakes do not automatically justify a new one. Landmark albums and albums that people will search for without knowing the band are great keeps. EP's that aren't generally known to the band's fans? Since the CD, EP's have largely gone the way of the dinosaur. Geogre 19:52, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, I don't think it would be a good idea to open the can of worms of judging every album article on Wikipedia as either "a landmark album" or "deletion fodder". —Stormie 03:57, Jul 26, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, its not even an album its an ep. Not a "landmark album" not a "landmark band" not even the most notable commercially or critically that this band has produced. Anyway this isnt the Utimate Band List, surely a Discography at the bottom of every band article rather than a seperate entry for each album ep or single release would be better suited to Wikipedia? --Sideshow 05:21, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, Incubus is famous, it makes sense to have articles on their albums. People want to know about this stuff. Makes little difference that it's an EP. Everyking 11:37, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Gamaliel 15:57, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete unless somebody can add something substantial about the album's historical/cultural/artistic significance. As it stands, it's barely more than a track listing, and an encylopedia isn't the right place for track listings. The band's official web site is. Triskaideka 16:04, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, perfectly acceptable album stub. Jgm 17:44, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Fancruft. Delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:34, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Incubus is a famous band. There are many less famous bands who have all of their albums in the Wikipedia. This just needs cleanup, it shouldn't be deleted because it's a stub. As for whether albums should be on Wikipedia at all, there's a WikiProject Albums, so I think they're here to stay. - Eisnel 07:10, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, album is probably encyclopedia-worthy even if current article is just a stub. -- Jmabel 00:46, Jul 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, IMHO albums are encyclopedia-worthy - singles or individual tracks aren't. -- Chuq 08:01, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep and send to cleanup. There are probably a number of Incubus fans who can fill in the blanks as to history and such beyond the release date and label. We should reconsider a delete vote if it doesn't improve in the next month or two, but it's pretty harmless as is. - Lucky 6.9 21:41, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Enjoy_Incubus&oldid=357514016"