Talk:Thomas Ridgway

Food and drink: Foodservice Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I would like to point out that the annonymous editor to this page is Andy Mabbet, the only guy I have ever met to hold such a grudge against Birmingham, so much so that he scoured through brum,pages listing it as copyright violations (even if a few sentences in an entire article were knicked), I abided by the rules and removed the violations and now he manipulates the temp pages to try and somehow show the article in a negative light, very, very sad indeed Andy, get a life mate.

I'm under no obligation to explain this edit, but for once I will in the hope of you seeing why people edit your text. Fundamentals: Wikipedia requires Neutral point of view, and an aspect of this is to Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms: i.e. hyped language. On that basis:

Thomas Ridgway was Birmingham tradesman who specialised in the import and sale of Tea during the early 19th century.

He wasn't exclusively a Birmingham tradesman; he traded in London too. "Birmingham-born" would be fine if we had a verification. Since there's currently none, "a tradesman" sticks to the known facts. It's also worth mentioning that he also sold coffee and spices, as the Times display ad verifies.

Ridgway was one of the earliest British Tea pioneers first setting up shop in the Bull ring area of Birmingham he later went bankrupt and moved to London.

Pioneer = peacock term, making tea trading sound intrepid and macho.

Ridgway continued his trade in Tea later paying back the money he had initialy borrowed from his creditors.

Much of that is unnecessary. Creditors = people you owe money to. It doesn't mean you borrowed money from them.

Ridgway was interested in keeping his products fresh and clean and so became one of the earliest English tea companies to prepack tea hygienically, the purpose being to avoid contamination.

Without a verifiable source, Ridgway's precise motives are conjecture. But what is on record is that the big deal with the tea and coffee trade in the mid-1800s was deliberate adulteration - as mentioned at [1] and in Ridgways own comments in The Times - crooked grocers mixing loose tea/coffee with floor sweepings, and that looks the main reason for pre-packing.

In 1876 Queen Victoria was so impressed by the House of Ridgways that she requested a blend be created for her personal use. This gave birth to Her Majesty's Blend.

Hype. Unless there's documentation of her saying "We are most impressed", it's conjecture why the deal was struck. So just report the fact neutrally.

On that basis, the edit you reverted was perfectly reasonable. This is the type of reasoning that goes on behind the scenes of edits. But life is too short to post such detailed explanations for every edit. All that Wikipedia requires is an edit summary, and you really have to trust that most edits are done for good reason (which is anyway verifiable when the edit introduces cited sources).

As to the copyvios: whyever do you introduce them in the first place? You say you know copyright - so make sure copyrighted text is avoided from the start. Using texts then saying "hey let's sort out the copyright later" is bound to run into trouble. It would also help if you cited sources as part of your working process; you presumably have them handy to be able to write the document. RayGirvan 11:27, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ray, let me explain why you and or? Andy Mabbett find such conflict whenever we meet.

A perfect example: I'm under no obligation to explain this edit, but for once I will in the hope of you seeing why people edit your text. ~ You see Ray, childish little comments like this get my back up and rather than me actually looking at what you are editing I simply read you as a condesending idiot with little or no respect for my work, through this red mist I often overlook whatever it is you are actually doing, try and explain things in a less sophomoric manner and we could actually get on for the good of my articles you so enjoy editing. Nick Boulevard 18:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

WP:FOOD Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent research update - Please Note

moved from the article to the talk page

As of: 15 August 2011, Ridgway customer service stated that the parent company has discontinued HMB and only old stock is available on the open market, for this century old, highest quality blend. E P Campbell.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Ridgway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050601080608/http://www.fairtrade.org.uk:80/ to http://www.fairtrade.org.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]