Talk:Autorack

Autorack was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: January 19, 2007.

Trains High‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	August 19 2006

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Update

Autorack articles has been consolidated from auto carrier under this heading, and internal links in a number of related articles have been updated. Vaoverland 04:52, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Cartic

These vehicles look very similar to a British Rail wagon called a Cartic 4, which was an articulated double decker. Unfortunately, I don't know when they were introduced, but surely it's worth mentioning the name.--86.164.168.185 (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Platform vs Rack

The description of the picture was correct (re: 25Mar 2011 edit). The platform consists of the yellow bar and everything below it (the wheels, axles, bogies, and all the bits to keep it on the tracks), while the racks themselves are the red/silver parts which sit upon the platform. This allows, as in this picture, a rack owned by one company to ride on a platform owned by another. Prompt Critical (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Links

The Following External links are dead (either 404 or no longer hosted):

"The Evolution of Automobile Traffic" — 2003 article from The National Railway Bulletin 68 (1).
"Johnstown America delivers first aluminum auto carriers to First Union Rail" — August 3, 2004 online article from Trains Magazine.
Anton Anderson Memorial Tunnel — "North America's Longest Railway-Highway Tunnel."
Guide to Railcars

As I do not make changes, just notice errors during my casual perusals, anyone care to clean them up?

Collision-Shift (talk) 03:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... inadvertently selected CSD, there is a copyvio concern here but not to the level of CSD, please ignore --MadeYourReadThis (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the copyright violation? The article text here is way longer than the article at the link you cited. If you look at the history for this article, I created it in 2004, nine years before the date shown on the link you cited. I was not able to find any sentences that were duplicated on both as they stand right now. Slambo (Speak) 11:07, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see one paragraph in the Vert-A-Pac section that uses the same text. When was it added? According to this diff, it was in the Wikipedia article by 2010, still three years before the Railway Age article. Therefore, Railway Age copied text from Wikipedia, not the other way around. Slambo (Speak) 11:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The full report on this issue also shows the duplicated text in at most one paragraph and one additional phrase. Blanking the page is excessive in this case regardless of which article came first. Slambo (Speak) 11:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the copyvio tag per above.--agr (talk) 02:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]