Jump to content

Talk:J. K. Rowling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleJ. K. Rowling is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 11, 2008, and on June 26, 2022.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 3, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 3, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
October 7, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 8, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
April 15, 2022Featured article reviewKept
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 31, 2017, July 31, 2021, July 31, 2022, and July 31, 2024.
Current status: Featured article

[edit]

Its doesn't include the recent Olympic Athlete that is in trials do to her transphobic remarks 186.53.82.165 (talk) 23:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:J. K. Rowling/Archive 22#Rowling and Musk named in cyber-bullying case; no consensus to add that content. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CITEVAR

[edit]

Hi, Alarics; thanks for the ref cleanup and the tidying, but the established citation style on this WP:FA is to wikilink publishers. Could you help me understand why you are unlinking only a couple publishers, and adding unnecessary locations on only a few (after I partially corrected that once already?) Featured articles must have consistent citations, and this one has a well-defined style. Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The convention I follow is that the location (i.e. the city of publication) should be given for every newspaper unless it is part of the paper's name. This is necessary because there are, for instance, several newspapers around the world called The Guardian. So I don't agree that these locations are "unnecessary". In the case of mainstream newspapers at least, this is a more useful form of disambiguation than giving the name of the publisher, since publishers of newspapers nowadays tend to change because of company mergers, etc., whereas they very rarely change location. The Daily Mirror, for example, is now on at least its fifth owner, but it has been published in London consistently for 121 years. This distinguishes it from the Daily Mirror in Sri Lanka. Also, Template:Cite news says "Do not use the publisher parameter for the name of a work (e.g. a website, book, encyclopedia, newspaper, magazine, journal, etc.)".
I wasn't aware of the "featured article" rule you mention, sorry. I absolutely agree with you about the desirability of consistency within any one article but on this occasion I realised I wasn't going to have time to do everything that needed doing. -- Alarics (talk) 21:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for explaining; I understand the logic behind your personal convention, but that's not the CITEVAR used on this article, or agreed upon in many featured articles. If others agree that locations should be more broadly added, we could consider changing the established style, but most of the newspapers used here are well known. I think we're using the work/publisher parameters correctly throughout, but if you see a place where that is not the case, pls advise. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:40, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]