Talk:Napa County, California

California: San Francisco Bay Area Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: U.S. counties Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

Get started

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambot (talk • contribs) 21:38, 26 July 2003 (UTC)[reply]

Bliss

As much as I would love to parade around shouting that Bliss (Default background for WinXP) was taken in Napa. I would like to have some citation for this. I'll be back later to put a citation needed (if one is not given).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Taboo Tongue (talk • contribs) 23:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found this http://s-r.com/local/story_txt.asp?date=022204&ID=s1490284, it states that a microsoft spokesman said that it was taken just outside of Napa, Ca. So that means it could be inside Napa County or even in Solano County. My guess would be that it's somewhere in Napa County. I haven't the time at the moment to look into this further at the moment... maybe later... Loquat15 13:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice thank you Taboo Tongue 15:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is west of Napa, in Sonoma county, perhaps somewhere east of Petaluma. 24.23.177.218 (talk) 05:02, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The location is on the bluff at Alston Park near redwood road. The fact is supported by ruins. The road was the 19th century pass over the mountaib to Sonoma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:643:0:8890:693A:65F8:3EBD:E5 (talk) 04:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bliss photo was taken in Sonoma County in January 1996 by Charles O'Rear.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Napa56 (talk • contribs) 14:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

despite its length, this article has a shallow history section and is absent of ecology. references are weak and slight POV shows through. thus rating of "start" is appropriate. Anlace 04:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Hi, I propose a merge of Napa City-County Library into this article, no information on said article, not particuarly notable. yes/no? -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 01:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt about fort quote

[I am new to Wikipedia. Please excuse any mistakes. The following excerpt would seem to cast doubt upon the quoted assertion, re-quoted in this Wikipedia entry. If unsupported by factual record, the assertion may be of some worth nevertheless, given the date it was made (i.e. proximate enough to 1776 that common knowledge and word of mouth might be accurate, albeit corrupted by unknown influences). Perhaps the statement ought to be qualified (e.g. "According to one source") rather than deleted altogether. Zroyce (talk) 17:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)][reply]

Excerpt from History of Napa and Lake Counties, authored by Lyman L. Palmer, published in 1881 by Slocum, Bowen & Co, San Francisco:

A writer, in a work published by Smith & Elliot, in 1878, says: “In 1776 a fort was erected by the Spanish Governor, Felipe de Neve, a short distance north-west of Napa, on an elevated plateu. Part of the original fort is now standing, the wall being of adobe, and three feet in thickness. It is situated on the Rancho Vilijo, and is occupied as a residence and wine cellar by J.J. Sigrist.” We are obliged to take issue with this statement. We do not know the writer’s authority, but are conversant with the history of the movements of the Spaniards in this part of California during that year. It was in 1776 that the first location was made at San Francisco, and the grant to the Mission is dated October 9th of that year. While waiting for the vessel to arrive, which had been dispatched with supplies, etc., excursions were made into the interior, and the circuit of the bay was made by way of San Jose, and far up the Alameda side. Another party crossed the strait at Saucelito, and passed as far northward as the Olompoli Rancheria, south of Petaluma a few miles, where they taught the Indians how to make adobe houses, and one was erected which stood there until a very few years ago, when it was torn down. The writer has seen adobes from the old structure, which was evidently the first one ever built north of San Francisco Bay. But in none of the records of these excursions is any mention made of the erection of a fort at the place mentioned above. We should be glad to establish the fact if it were possible, and to confer, substantiated, upon Napa County, the honor of having such an ancient relic of the Spanish regime within its boundaries, but a due regard for the truth prevents us from giving the statement unqualifiedly.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Napa County, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]