Talk:Glacier

Glacier was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 27, 2005	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
December 20, 2005	Good article nominee	Listed
February 14, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Glaciers Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Top‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Glacier is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Ogive (glacier) was copied or moved into Glacier#Ogives with this edit on 21:30, 2 April 2012. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

Archive 1

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WendyCisneros.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No need for matter of fact language

Not only is anthropogenic climate change not a fact, it is not necessary to state it as one. In this case, a simple addition of “Climate scientists believe” or “It is thought” or “Increased co2 levels suggest” to the below listed entry solves the issue. This is not a debate or discussion about Climate Change, just the terms used when stating it. I would prefer someone edit it who worked on the article. Thank you. David

Under the CLIMATE CHANGE section;

“Human activity has caused an increase in greenhouse gases creating a global warming trend,[58] causing these valuable glaciers to melt.” WaveGuidedFunction (talk) 14:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but, anthropogenic climate change has been quite well established as "fact" by the scientists working in the field. Yes, the oil company execs and their buddies are in denial about it - because they might lose a buck or two and $$$ is all they care about. Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 19:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]