Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vosem Chart

Original research. Apparently a user named 3ebnut on Kuro5hin came up with this, and posted it to that site about a year ago. Google reveals Kuro5hin, Wikipedia and clones, and a Selectsmart quiz, which I presume the same guy created. -- WOT 19:53, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Keep, unconvinced by evidence. Sam [Spade] 20:49, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Tentative keep. Jmabel 21:27, Jul 31, 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I'm convinced it's a neat chart. I'm not convinced that it's notable or in-use. It seems like individual research. Like most such, it seeks to fill a real void. Like most such, it needs to show adoption/publication to be encyclopedic. Geogre 21:34, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Shouldn't the onus of evidence rest on the article (especially if you're going to cast a vote to keep)? A circumstantial bit against it (in my view) is that it was originally posted by an anonymous user. I've since found one other reference to it on an unnotable "this-is-not-a-blog" blog where the author refers to it in a discussion of the Nolan Chart, citing Wikipedia as his source for the Vosem Chart ([1]). This, to me, is a reason to delete the article before it can further exploit Wikipedia's authority. The Kuro5hin link could go to the bottom of the Nolan Chart page. -- WOT 21:58, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Delete original research. -- Cyrius|✎ 22:05, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Ditto. Delete. DannyBoy | Talk 02:15, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Original research, and culturally biased to boot. -Sean Curtin 06:11, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete - David Gerard 12:23, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Here's a political site where you can see where you fall. Salasks 17:43, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete, with the hope that it comes back later as well known as the Nolan Chart. The Kuro5hin article is most interesting, but unfortunately in my estimation constitutes original research. Denni ☯ 19:37, 2004 Aug 1 (UTC)
Delete. Not even orig research, just a trivial mechanism that needs orig research to establish whether it offers any advantage. --Jerzy (t) 21:03, 2004 Aug 5 (UTC)
Delete. Original research. --Michael Snow 23:10, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)