Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsunami Relief
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 23:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Does this group exist? The external link on the article doesn't work any more (I have removed it) - only the link to the hosted store, which has no supporting info for its claim that the money goes to help. The name is so generic that Google searches aren't helpful. - DavidWBrooks 16:47, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete The link is to a CafePress site (online store where anyone can post merchandise) and that seems to reenforce it's non-notability, not to mention disambiguation problems with actual tsunami relief efforts. --Onlyemarie 16:50, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, official relief efforts don't use Cafepress. Mgm|(talk) 18:37, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, unless much better evidence of reality, notability, and authenticity is provided, such as major press coverage, listing by organizations that rate charities, etc. Unpleasantly reminiscent of QuakeAID. Dpbsmith (talk) 19:54, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: I've nowikied the outside link. Kappa 19:58, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 07:27, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nn tsunamicruft. ComCat 06:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, unverifiable, smells strongly of scam. A real charity would have a domain or at the very least a listing on some credible source. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:45, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.