Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eckvic (god)

This contradicts what was said in the other "Demish" articles, as it implies an ethnicity. The factuality and significance is in doubt. Geogre 01:40, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC) Note that Netoholic vandalized the VfD page by removing this nomination. I have reinstated it and will be clear: Google has no hits for this phenomenon. Geogre 03:18, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Please provide proof before making personal attacks about other users on Wikipedia. Otherwise, it will be looked upon as a smear accusation. 172.195.176.166 03:20, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

And what are you, User:172.195.176.166? You may look upon it as a smear, but removing nominations from VfD is, indeed, page vandalism, unambiguously, and even an IP can look at the history to see the "Removed three nominations. VfD is not for determining factuality" by Netoholic.

• Delete. No evidence. Prank. Mikkalai 03:31, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Zero Google hits on Eckvic. The Great God Eckvic must hide Himself well indeed. Antandrus 03:41, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • That was my suspicion, but I wanted community consensus before proceding any further. I still await other voices and opinions. You can go to the Demish page and click "What links here" to see the other possible nominees. Geogre 04:00, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-factual. -- orthogonal 04:20, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: fabrication. See also my comments under Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Eckvic Culture. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:36, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, it's interesting and therefore worthy of being in this encyclopedia! -- Crevaner 09:43, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete --[[User:Allyunion|AllyUnion (Talk)]] 11:09, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete if not verified. Average Earthman 11:58, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete this and its related disambiguation page at Eckvic. Angela. 20:34, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Hoax. — Gwalla | Talk 01:06, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like a prank. Jayjg 03:24, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Deleting, per author; see User_talk:RickK. Mikkalai 04:54, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)