Wikipedia talk:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/to do

It's very surprising most of the 'to create' articles haven't already got at least stubs. Is there any reason why a three- or four-line stub wouldn't be acceptable for all these entries?

That's why we're here! Speaking of that, how about registering an account, and helping out? Or if you've already got one, logging in... Ambi 06:47, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Criteria for advancing articles?

It's fairly obvious when to remove an article from "To create". Less obvious whether to move it to "To improve or expand" or just drop it, and when to promote from "To improve or expand" to "To review", or drop completely. --Scott Davis ^Talk 05:35, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm often one to tidy up the list and to be honest, I've wondered this exact point Scott makes for some time; what to promote, what to highlight as needed and so on? There is no definite criteria.

I think the headings may have originally been created to encourage edits to the articles in question, any edits, perhaps in the days when Wikipedia was in it's infacy. Today, the Australian content is structured and categorised well enough to be able to get into the area of yout interest, and we've got a lot of interested and contributing Australian editors now to touch up as they go in their particluar area of interest. I'd love to scrap them and redesign it outright. Anyone? -- Longhair | Talk 08:30, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff Clark

I created a short Biography of Geoff Clark. Bobby1011 12:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant so merge and delete?

If not already listed I am going to add these to the complete to do list, as the Template:Australia opentask is now being used. The the page could be deleted. - Shiftchange 12:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]