User talk:Pengliujian

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I find useful

Cheers, Sam [Spade] 01:37, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Emotional Freedom Techniques. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a point of information, I edited the page exactly once. My edit was immediately reverted, so rather than continuing to edit, I raised the issue in the talk page. Pengliujian (talk) 13:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. Here's you twice trying to add the same tag.[1][2] Alexbrn (talk) 13:29, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right - when I didn't see it on the page, I thought I'd failed to save it, so put it in again. This was a reasonable conclusion to draw, given that the normal response to a citation needed tag is to provide a citation rather than immediately deleting the tag. When I said I edited once I was referring to my addition of the source that I mention on the Talk page, which was immediately reverted. Pengliujian (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Take care: the page is subject to discretionary sanctions. WP:LEDEs do not need citations if the content is sourced in the body. Alexbrn (talk) 14:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair point. My main issue with the article is that it presents opinions as uncontested facts. If there's no citation, then hedging language is needed, e.g., "It is generally thought that ..." "There is a consensus in the medical community that ..." etc.Pengliujian (talk) 14:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pengliujian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pengliujian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Social marxism

Hello, Pengliujian,

Did you want this page deleted? You put a speedy deletion tag on it, which the administrator was responding to but then removed it right before the page was deleted. If you would like to continue to work on it, please make a request at WP:REFUND although I would suggest moving this page to Draft space as it is not really ready yet to be in main space.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC) \\[reply]

I marked it for deletion because the capitalisation was wrong. Pengliujian (talk) 10:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Social Marxism moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Social Marxism, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is improved and ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I put it up quickly because a lot of people were asking what the hell "social Marxism" was and there was no Wikipedia page. If the phrase continues to be used, I'll work on the article; if it drops out, then we don't need an article. I could only find one article on EBSCO that has the phrase in the title, so either it will (a) lapse into disuse, (b) snowball, in whcih case we'll need an exanded article or, most likely, (c) become a synonym amongst pundits and conspiracy theorists for "cultural Marxism", in which case we can just add a note to the Cultural Marxism page. Pengliujian (talk) 10:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Social Marxism

Hello, Pengliujian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Social Marxism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Social Marxism

Hello, Pengliujian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Social Marxism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]