Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual cognitive psychology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This was nominated for speedy, but doesn't fit any of the criteria. Nevertheless, delete--one google hit for the phrase, and the "none to date" under criticisms seems suspicious. Meelar (talk) 14:31, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable, at least. Fire Star 14:37, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, has the word "sex" in the title so it's wrong and dirty and offensive. Obscure, could be a note under a sexual psychology article perhaps. --Asriel86 16:53, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Just a note--are you sure this subject actually exists? I wasn't able to find any evidence. Meelar (talk) 19:03, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think it has its own distinctive segment, the article sounds like regular cognitive psychology (even neo-freudism), only poorly formatted and even more poorly explained. --Asriel86 19:14, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Just a note--are you sure this subject actually exists? I wasn't able to find any evidence. Meelar (talk) 19:03, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, I have a Bachelor's in Cognitive Science and can assure you it's nonsense. This subject doesn't exist as worded, and the article's content has little to no basis in fact. --Chrysaor 20:13, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nn sexcruft. ComCat 06:27, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.