User talk:Spellcheck
February 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm Arxiloxos. Your recent edit to the page Ivanpah Solar Power Facility appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Arxiloxos (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the note on my talk page. I also wasn't sure about some of the rewording and the apparent deletion of a source from the footnotes, but I didn't focus on those. In any case, if you haven't seen it already, you might want to look at the article in today's (March 1, 2014) Los Angeles Times: "Massive desert solar plant opens, already a threatened species". Best,--Arxiloxos (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Yes and No (game)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Yes and No (game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 22:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Your bot request is ready for a hopefully final trial. — xaosflux Talk 03:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
BAGBot: Your bot request JoelHelperBot
[edit]Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JoelHelperBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 15:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nichijou subtitle.png
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Nichijou subtitle.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 23:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Spellcheck/Nicole Santos
[edit]User:Spellcheck/Nicole Santos, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Spellcheck/Nicole Santos and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Spellcheck/Nicole Santos during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 23:26, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Legacypac (talk) 00:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]TransWomanDefinitionChart
[edit]Thank you for your Definition Chart, Spellcheck. I'd like to comment on it and I was wondering: wouldn't it be better if you place your comment at the bottom of the section Talk:Trans_woman#Grouping_the_sources_in_Talk:Trans_woman/Definitions, where it would be entirely in-topic and relevant? I don't see the point of having it in the middle of the section Talk:Trans_woman#"A_trans_woman_is_a_woman"_and_NPOV. It also interrupts the chronological and logical order of the discussion there. Thanks, Gitz (talk) (contribs) 12:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion! I wasn't sure what the best place to comment was, as there were a few discussions that seemed relevant - I'm happy to defer to someone who is more familiar with how the discussion flows. I've moved my comment accordingly, that does seem like a good place indeed. The Human Spellchecker (talk) 16:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)