Talk:Magic sword

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Blades (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blades, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BladesWikipedia:WikiProject BladesTemplate:WikiProject BladesBlades articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Sa'angreal#Items of Power|Sa'angreal]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2018 and 18 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BrindleSLC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Untitled]

Many RPG do have magic-powered swords, this is not a speedy candidate! --SuperDude 03:41, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This will garner an overwhelming consensus to delete on VfD, just as the last CSD article you objected to did. But, if you insist, we can push it to VfD. I don't know how to get through to you to show you that creating junk articles like this is not beneficial to Wikipedia; however, the least you could do is accept the fact that these kinds of articles simply aren't going to be kept. android↔talk 04:29, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

I don't think this is a speedy. I'm going to take off the notice. The guidelines on speedies are not meant to cover this. Charles Matthews 07:50, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Good call. I posted it for a speedy since an admin was planning on doing it anyway. Looks like we have ourselves a real article now! Thanks for having a cooler head than I over this issue. - Lucky 6.9 19:16, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Votes for deletion results

This article was proposed for deletion; the result was to keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Magic sword for a record. Postdlf 00:20, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Other swords

should other swords such as Kladenets, Gram, Balmung, etc. be included here? if not: is there some obvious reason why an article listing Mythological/folkloric magic swords should not be made? --illumi 00:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see any reason why noteworthy swords shouldn't be included, though as part of discussion might be better than a list.

A list of magical swords would also be fine. Goldfritha 00:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007-03-14 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American magic sword

Hey is there any kind of American mythological magic sword (not from sci fi).... I would think there wouldn't be as they all seem to predate the colonization era.... //// Pacific PanDeist * 09:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jabberwocky

Lewis Carrol never specifies exactly what is meant by 'vorpal', Jabberwocky is a very silly poem and vorpal could mean anything from 'sharp' to 'shiny' to 'made of live weasels'. To the best of my knowledge no definition is given by Lewis Carrol. Vorpal blades can be found in many RPGs, and it is D&D that gives vorpal blades the power to decapitate something on a critical hit. (The youth in the poem does hack off the creatures head, but this probably occurs after the creature's death). Paladinwannabe2 19:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caliburn and Excalibur

The article says that Caliburn was the name of the Sword in the Stone in Arthurian legend, and was a seperate sword from Excalibur. While most sources do support that the SitS was a different weapon, thos same sources state (And even Excalibur's Wikipedia article.) that Caliburn is simply an earlier name for Excalibur. To my knowledge, the Sword in the Stone never had any name other than "Sword in the Stone." --TwilightDuality (talk) 13:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bolding

My understanding is that bolding is used for synonyms of the article title, not for examples of the subject. So the names of swords should be unbolded. If I'm misunderstanding the rule, then all the names should be bolded here--one or the other. Nareek (talk) 10:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skofnung

How about a mention of the sword Skofnung from the saga of Hrolf Kraki?Bobbythemazarin (talk) 15:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one. I second that.73.220.34.167 (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

The complete dearth of references in this article is absolutely unacceptable and renders it utterly useless. 94.194.213.4 (talk) 11:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe be bold and edit the article yourself? Carl Sixsmith (talk) 11:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would be pointless...73.220.34.167 (talk) 18:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What if the sword is not physical at least not within this reality or plan of existence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.52.209.187 (talk) 04:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical swords

This section is controversial. Many would argue that the biblical accounts (as well as the swords) are neither fictional nor mythological. In addition, none of the biblical swords were ever said to be "imbued with magical power". Going by the Magic (paranormal) page, magic is synonymous with sorcery. Supernatural power acquired through sorcery is essentially different from supernatural power given by God. To label these swords as "magic" is incorrect and quite controversial (as somebody mentioned on the Talk:Flaming sword (mythology) page).

Besides that, this whole section is vague and lacks citations (especially for the stuff about "extra-biblical mythology and traditions"). 96.227.142.233 (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If a god made a magic sword, it would then be magical, no? Or are you talking about things like flaming swords being obvious metaphors?73.220.34.167 (talk) 18:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only issue I see is it being out of the Mythological section. "Myth" is not a statement of truth or falsehood, and the mythology of the Bible includes swords.--189.127.29.141 (talk) 03:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abrahamic Swords?

"One would only have to see how they are referenced within the Holy Books of Christians, Jews and Muslims to make this point evident."

Where in these books are swords ever talked about? I mean, apart from some symbolism or a random reference. The Holy or Magical sword is more popular in German and Japanese culture than probably anywhere...73.220.34.167 (talk) 18:09, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peace and Love

"Since most of them were Buddhists (a religion that finds violence and murder abhorent), that train of thought gave them some peace of mind in their killing vocation."

This sentence sounds like "Buddhists are peaceful, unlike other religions". As is typical in Western thought. Most religions speak against violence and murder. But most religions, such as Buddhism, allow for both in the right situation. Buddhists are not utter pacifists or non-violent as Westerner make out. Just like the vegetarian thing in the West. Real Buddhists eat meat daily. Try finding vegetarian food in Japan or China!

There is also no citation. In my experience, no citation is an auto-delete.

"Abhorrent" is also spelled wrong.

73.220.34.167 (talk) 19:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magic sword. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050428082953/http://www.chinapage.com/8-immortal.html to http://www.chinapage.com/8-immortal.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning Up this article

After carefully reviewing this article I have come to the conclusion it is a mess.

I propose deletion of the biblical references. As demonstrated on this talk page they are a point of contention. Including them in this article, without citations, goes against the spirit of Wikipedia.

As this page more serves as a general overview, the inclusion of information in the lists may be served better as simple links to corresponding entries. The lists are currently extremely unorganized, bulky, and for the most part missing sources.

BrindleSLC (talk) 06:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Magic sword (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]