Wikipedia:Peer review/Christmas/archive1
Christmas#History behind Christmas in particular needs to be checked for accuracy and for tone.
Eequor 20:07, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- I wikified this section and fixed a few infelicities. I tried not to destroy the tone, which is perhaps too informal but nevertheless entertaining. I hope it doesn't get bowdlerised into mediocrity. -- Heron 12:16, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I buffed up the main text, but I agree with Equor above. I don't know WHAT is going on with the "History Behind Christmas" section. sfahey,8/18/04. Sfahey 22:10, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- I've also done some tidying, but lost the will to live around 'Christmas in the media'. That's still one section before Christmas#History behind Christmas which needs the most attention. The article suffers a little from 'committee editing' (or is that anarchy editing), but it is getting there. -- Solipsist 21:06, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)