Talk:Chagang Province
Population
[edit]The figure "1 147 946" given for population appears to have been copied from the Polish Wikipedia, which also does not cite a source. Paran encyclopedia gives 1,211,413, and also does not cite a source. Yahoo gives the same number and dates it to 1991. ...Anyway, does anyone have access to an authoritative source? -- Visviva 01:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Redirection
[edit]Why does Jagang redirect to here? Its not a misspelling, its a fictional character from the sword of truth series. --Worldgate (talk) 01:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Chagang Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930050148/http://www.kcckp.net/en/periodic/todaykorea/index.php?contents+2244+2006-09+88+18 to http://www.kcckp.net/en/periodic/todaykorea/index.php?contents+2244+2006-09+88+18
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927190945/http://www.kcckp.net/en/news/news_view.php?0+4931 to http://www.kcckp.net/en/news/news_view.php?0+4931
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930050155/http://www.kcckp.net/en/periodic/korea/index.php?contents+1308+2006-03+49+12 to http://www.kcckp.net/en/periodic/korea/index.php?contents+1308+2006-03+49+12
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040514171020/http://210.145.168.243:80/pk/084th_issue/9903303.htm to http://210.145.168.243/pk/084th_issue/9903303.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
{{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chagang Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060109202822/http://nk.chosun.com/map/map.html?ACT=geo_01 to http://nk.chosun.com/map/map.html?ACT=geo_01
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041018022439/http://www.xzqh.org/waiguo/asia/1002.htm to http://www.xzqh.org/waiguo/asia/1002.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://210.145.168.243/pk/084th_issue/9903303.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 2 August 2017 (UTC)