User talk:Albrown

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Sphinx Dating

Mr. Brown, I noticed the foofaraw over Sphinx dating/deletions. The point you want to include is controversial; it's at odds with academic orthodoxy. In my experience here I've found that controversial viewpoints are least likely to be deleted if they're:

Firmly attributed to someone else
Not at the top of the article.

I'd recommend adding a note somewhere towards the bottom, along the lines of "Recently, Prof. So-and-so has argued, based on geological research, for a considerably older dating of the Sphinx than previously thought in his book Sphinx Dating for Fun and Profit." Keep it short and punchy, then put something in =References= or =External Links= for more information. That way it's a lot harder to justify outright deletion. Hope this helps. Bacchiad 02:50, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Try to Google for some hard information from a geology site. Get the author's name and book title that started the fuss. Not a New Age tabloid-from-the- checkout-counter kind of website, of which there are many. The Sphinx attracts clowns, so everyone is wary. Well-presented material is worth it's own subsection at Sphinx. Hearsay is not good enough to remain in the entry for long. Wetman 05:34, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)