Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suncrest Washington

This is pointless, no information and the user keeps reverting away from the stub message.--207.69.139.135 01:58, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Keep. May be a stub, but it's still a real place. RickK | Talk 02:58, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
~~Keep~~ - See page history. This appears to be an attempt by CoolDude to prevent others from editing an article he views as "his". -- Cyrius | Talk 04:44, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
- You have got to read his comments in the edit history, ROFL! Mkweise 06:52, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  - This needs to go on the "silly edit wars" page. Ashibaka ✎
  - I especially liked "LEAVE THIS PAGE ALONE, I AM LOOSING MY PATIENTS!" -- ChrisO 09:57, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
    - This edit summary is duplicated in the VfD-Main page edit history as well :) - Fennec 20:12, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
    - That reminds me of what Dr. Frankenstein used to say -- "RUN AWAY, MY PATIENT IS LOOSE!" Har har har, Wile E. Heresiarch 23:17, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Keep. It's a real place, as RickK points out. 207.69.139.135 appears to be a sock puppet for CoolDude, who seems to think that he owns the article. I think Cyrius is right - this looks like an attempt to ensure that if CoolDude can't edit the page as he likes, nobody else should be allowed to either. -- ChrisO 09:56, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I've changed my vote, as this place appears to be just a trailer park - hardly significant enough for an article. -- ChrisO 18:04, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Not ideal but no reason for deletion. Andrewa 13:19, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep - it's a stub, but factual. Mark Richards 16:30, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Re debate below - if it is a trailer park, then I would vote to delete... Mark Richards 20:13, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Delete, it has no info hardley and CoolDude, is just going to keep removing the stub message, look at the talk page, he can get around bans though proxies.
- Another CoolDude sock puppet... -- ChrisO 22:40, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Most likley.
  - Yeah, right, you stick with that story, I don't beleive you.
    - Are you LOOSING YOUR PATIENTS yet? Ashibaka ✎
      - I am not CoolDude, I just feel that there is no reason to keep the page, CoolDude will vandalise on --CoolDude 19:25, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
        Really not cool dude, huh, you sig says diffrent.--207.69.139.146 19:27, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
        
        Hahaha. You forgot to log out before you posted as a sock puppet. RADICALBENDER ★ 19:28, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
        No I am no Sock Puppet. If you even look at the histoy for what CoolDude thinks is his page, I have reverted an edit by him even.--207.69.139.145 19:34, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
        Wasn't talking to you. I haven't a clue who you are... RADICALBENDER ★ 19:37, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
        
        Maybe it is CoolDude running one of those programs where it always connects you though another proxy.--Ryan524 19:44, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
        From Talk:Suncrest, Washington:
        ^I was requesting for it to be protected, all the edting was redicoulus, i have put it up on vfd, i don't wish for it to be anymore. As for the ban, I have almost unlimeted proxies i coud go though.
        
        You will be banning till the day u die then, their are so many anonimus proxies in the world.
        - Fennec 20:07, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
        
        Watch Cooldude edit AND sign the message in question. - Fennec 20:03, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
        Taht's funny but I bet the admins won't give up banning.
        
        Bwahahaha! This is getting funnier by the hour... :-P -- ChrisO 23:08, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
~~Keep.~~ Req ban for CoolDude and all his puppets.. Ashibaka ✎ 19:12, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, trailer park :( I wrote up an entry on BJAOD already, so don't worry about that. Ashibaka ✎ 22:34, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Agree with Ashibaka. Meelar 19:30, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I agree too, ban CoolDude and all pupets.--Ryan524 19:39, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC) ...and keep the article too.

To an admin: It would seem all but CoolDude and his Sock Puppets agree to keep this page, if you ask me this disscussion should be terminated and the page kept.--Ryan524 20:38, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

And now for something completely different --- how about if we Rot-13 the whole article? - ;Bear 04:52, 2004 Apr 4 (UTC)
- "Fhaperfg, Jnfuvatgba vf ybpngrq whfg bhgfvqr bs Fcbxnar, Jnfuvatgba. Fhaperfg vf ybpngrq va Fgriraf Pbhagl naq vf ubzr gb gur Avar Zvyr Snyyf Fpubby Qvfgevpg." - hmm, makes more sense than any of CoolDude's versions so far! ;-) -- ChrisO 22:48, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
DELETE. maps.yahoo.com, mapblast, and mapquest have never heard of a Suncrest, WA. It seems to be a mobile home park in Nine Mile Falls. PS I support the bans. Niteowlneils 06:11, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Hmm - you may be right. I've checked it on the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names [1], which finds 12 Suncrests in the US but none in Washington. Is a trailer park really sufficiently important to have an encyclopedic article? -- ChrisO 09:32, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Aww, man. Delete trailer park article, move history to BJAODN. -- Cyrius|&#9998 17:21, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)
- Besides ads for broadband Internet Google shows issuance of a gas certificate to Washington Power [2]. - Hephaestos|§ 17:26, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Actually it exists but its not a trailer, check the school district page. there is a link to it on the page.
- The school district's page describes Suncrest as a "housing area" and explicitly says that "There are no incorporated towns within the District". [3] No vote, but given that description, I do not know what could ever turn this from a sub-stub to an article. Rossami 21:46, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Check the talk page I found proof that its more than some tralor park, it's not incorperated but its more than you would guess, I say KEEP!--Ryan524 08:37, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete the article and ban CoolDude. Wile E. Heresiarch 23:14, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. There is no reason to delete this. Kingturtle 07:12, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)