User talk:Ross Burgess

Welcome!

Hello, Ross Burgess, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 04:31, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)

Ionia

Do you mean that one Ionia is spelled with an omikron and the other with an omega? If that is what you mean you should say so. If that is not what you mean you should say what you do mean. Adam 11:26, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

UK railway stations - S

Hi. I've reverted your Sanderstead edit on UK railway stations - S. Links on that page should by convention be to railway station, not town, articles. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Ditto Dolwyddelan. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Polytonic template

When you encounter polytonic Greek script, in order to get rid of the font tags, use the {{polytonic}} template instead of {{IPA}}. The reason for this is explained on Template talk:Polytonic. Thanks. Etz Haim 00:20, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Apart from a minor difference in which font is preferred over which, these templates are identical. The main advantage is the semantic markup we achieve by this, as explained on Template talk:Polytonic. Etz Haim 08:03, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Republic

Hear, hear! A superb definition of republic. Thank you! Skyring 19:47, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Greek language

Thanks for fixing my "braino" (typo of the brain). Clicked the wrong heading to edit, I guess. -leigh (φθόγγος) 07:46, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

IPA Template

Thanks for correcting my edit to International Phonetic Alphabet for English. I'd wondered why there seemed to be superflous spaces after leading slashes or square brackets, but I hadn't realised that the slashes or brackets need to be inside the IPA template not outside. I've been correcting some of my own recent edits accordingly, and put a note on Template Talk:IPA. rossb 07:07, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

No problem, Ross! I did it the "wrong" way at first too and was also annoyed by the spurious spaces. I wasn't sure putting the brackets on the inside would work, but I tried it anyway, and lo and behold! the spaces were gone. --Angr 08:06, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Christian views of homosexuality

Please look at the image description, and read the article icon! --Amys 15:42, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sampa and Banda

Thanks for the wikilinks at Nafaanra language. I wanted to say that I didn't know that there was an article on Sampa but then I saw that you created it today. I'd be curious to know in what period it was a slave market. I know that Banda was on a trans-Saharan trade route in an early period; maybe the same applies to Sampa? Regards, — mark ✎ 16:27, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Oxted line

Hi Ross. When I first considered your note I thought, What can be said about a railway station beyond that it is?; and that it is there? Then I thought to look in my reference book - Railways of the Southern Region, Geoffrey Body, PSL Field Guide 1989 - and saw that obviously quite a lot can be said! Here is what can be said - taking Oxted station as an example:

Oxted station lies on the line between South Croydon and Hurst Green Junction, 20 miles from London Bridge. It is operated by the Southern railway as part of its Redhill-Tonbridge-Oxted services.

Oxted was opened as a joint LBSCR/SER station on 10 March 1884. Two tunnels are located at each end of the station: the one-mile Oxted Tunnel at the London end; and the 551 yard Limpsfield Tunnel at the country end. Before the Uckfield branch was electrified, the two sets of diesel units operating that branch and that to East Grinstead were joined here before continuing to London.

But then I had a look at what a preview might show - and see here:

neither Redhill nor Tonbridge have an article on the station, in spite of them both being vital links in the railway. If they don't, then what hope is there of Lingfield and Dormans, the other two stations on the East Grinstead line, ever getting one? These articles are all littered with red like this: at least if the place name is shown you know where it is!
Hurst Green, in my article is a junction, not a station; and my reference to East Grinstead and Uckfield are to branches and not stations

I have been doing a number of article amendments over the months since I have been attracted to Wikipedia, many of them places in Kent. So many of those completely ignore any communication aspects (I suppose I should say Transportation (ugh!)), that it would seem a little odd to have an article on a station for a place which apparently hasn't got one! If on the other hand, place articles included a railway mention, then it really wouldn't matter how far away the station was, would it? The station is only called what it is, because of the place.

I think that what I am saying is that we shouldn't get too bogged down in trying to provide an article on every small detail. I would prefer to see this article being a comprehensive one, covering the line and its two branches and dealing within the article with the individual stations, calling them by name and thus bringing in the raison d'etre of the station. But then I am a railway buff and always think in those terms Peter Shearan 19:30, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Pronunciation of Métis

Hi, Ross,

Saw your question about the pronunciation of Métis at Talk:Métis people (Canada). What problem do you see with the second pronunciation? In Canada francophones use a lot of short vowels. If it's just that the transcription was wrong, then mea culpa. Or maybe I've misunderstood second. John FitzGerald 03:25, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Incidentally, that pronunciation was introduced as the pronunciation in the varieties of French Métis actually speak. Someone removed the note about that, though.

Thanks for the note, Ross. It still might be worthwhile to add a note about the second pronunciation being the one used in the varieties of French Métis speak. For some reason European French is considered the standard (we don't do that in English, eh?). John FitzGerald 21:21, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

LB&SCR

I assume your have read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Commas. However I will support your change if some American pedant tries to reverse things. -- RHaworth 08:57, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)

Need Help

The article vanavsos is up for deletion. Can you please help in this regard. Second, I am having difficulty with Wikinfo:Classical definition of republic and am having trouble on Talk:Republic because they won't allow an external link. It was deleted off of Wikipedia, and I believe it needs to come back on. A serious mistake in deleting this article. Thanks for your time.WHEELER 18:26, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

ß

Oops -- take a look under Kra (letter). Jpatokal 10:34, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Viet phono

Hi. I have deleted the old HCMC consonant chart & replaced it the a new one (motivated by yr comment): Vietnamese_phonology#Ho_Chi_Minh_City. Peace. — ishwar (SPEAK) 22:23, 2005 Mar 22 (UTC)

Polytonic Greek

I saw you had put polytonic Greek into the article on arete. Unfortunately, this makes the wiki-code difficult to read (though it makes the article more precise). Is there any way to spell things out with &alpha AND put the diacritical marks in? WhiteC 01:35, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I agree the reader is more important. Is there an easy way to type it in without looking up unicodes manually? What sorts of references are there for this? WhiteC 13:04, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it is perfectly OK to use {{polytonic|α}} etc. However, there are two problems: 1) there are no named entities for characters with diacritics (e.g. alpha with an acute accent); 2) if you type Greek directly into the edit box using a Greek mapping for your keyboard (on Windows, you can set this up from Control Panel/Keyboard/Input Locales), it gets translated into the numerical entities. I suppose someone should write a robot to clean things like that up until the Wikimedia software can be improved.... --Macrakis 05:57, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks - just people like User:Angr irritate me - like World Book, Encarta, Britannica et al Wikipedia will eventually come to be used as a source for school projects and reports so it should be friendly and accessible to less educated people as Jim and Adam advocated and i agreed. PMA 10:22, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hebrew alphabet

Just a quick note to say thanks for cleaning up the table and catching the substitution errors ** <-> || at Hebrew alphabet. Is the table better than the bullet point list, do you think? -- ALoan (Talk) 20:11, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Aleph (letter) etc

Thanks for your work on the Semitic alphabet entries. I was wondering why you included two font variants for the Hebrew letters. The differences are not large and don't cover the (huge) range of variation if you include cursive forms, etc. I think one variant (choose a font -- or better a list of fonts) should be enough. Also, I have begun to add the Arabic versions of the Semitic letters (see vav). The names and phonetic values are very close; the graphic forms often interestingly different.... --Macrakis 05:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Modern Greek

Hey Ross! i wanna say i appreciate your great work in Modern Greek! Thanks! :) Project2501a 10:57, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greeks

This was a simultaneous editing conflict; my (somewhat fancier) fix of Graeco was being done while you fixed it. Please look at the section on Greek identity and see if it needs anything. Septentrionalis 17:03, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yog(h)urt

As I haven't visited the UK for 10 years, do all of the yoghurt products in the UK now use the "yogurt" spelling on their labels, or is it just a small number of them? Also, do you think the spelling of the yoghurt article should be changed? – AxSkov (T) 14:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration of Greek

Hi! I see you've been working on the Greek alphabet a lot. I started a discussion about transliteration of modern Greek on Talk:Greece, and copied and expanded your transliteration chart to Transliteration of Greek into English. My goal is a standard transliteration for modern Greek geographic and personal names in Wikipedia. Do you have any suggestions? Markussep 00:10, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

On the Greek language

From what I've noticed, you're probably the only person who's seriously interested on this topic. In my opinion the current state of the 'Greek language'-related articles is rather amateurish and unscientific, mainly for the reason that the documentation of the entire Greek language is badly summarised into few, poor articles, unlinked to each other. My idea is to expand this topic into a greater number of well-organised and well-written articles that will efficiently link to each other. For example the main article Greek language would be a short article, whose main purpose would be to provide links to each of the 5 periods of the Greek language, and eventually to the History of the Greek language. For each of its links, it should provide a brief description. On the next level, each period of the Greek language would link to its subsequent dialects. The dialect articles will be the lowest nodes of the tree (unless we later wish to expand it with their idioms), therefore this is where most of documentation will be concentrated (brief historical + analytical linguistic analysis). I would like you to help me create this skeleton, by cleaning-up the Greek language article and linking the periods of the Greek language, which in turn would link to their subsequent dialects. I will then improve or clean-up (if necessary) the linguistic dialect article-specific information. Let me know of your opinion. Miskin

My idea of a skeleton would be a tree with the article Greek Language as a root node, and the period-specific dialect articles as root nodes. We could also add on the second level a branch for proto-Greek. The history of the Greek language would be linked by most articles, so there's no reason to include it in the tree. Initially the only periods that will be divived into multiple dialects would be Classic and Modern Greek. The rest of the periods are less documented and dominated by a single dialect.

                                 Greek Language     
     ____________________________________|_________________________________________
    |                  |                 |                     |                   |

Mycenaean Greek Classic Greek Hellenistic Greek Medieval Greek Modern Greek

      |          _________|________ _______ . . .
      .         |         |        |       |
      .     Attic Ionic Doric Aeolic...
      .

Miskin 15:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you. I need your support against the people who might initially try to revert out of ignorance. Since you're the only person who shows a constant interest on those articles, I also needed your permission. Don't worry about the content of the articles, I will try to provide some decent information myself, it might however take some time until I translate into English from French and Greek. Thanks again. Miskin 13:21, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi. It was me who differentiated Mycenaean Greek from the rest of the periods of the Greek language, accidently as an anonymous user. I thought it would be more precise because most scholars regard Ancient Greek (Archaic and Classic) as the 1st stage. Mycenaean Greek is hardly documented and is generally categorised seperately, as one of the early stages of the Greek language (such as Proto-Greek). It's probably because they are both placed before the creation of the Greek alphabet, which marks the beginning of a continuous documented history of the language. There's no documented evolution between Proto-Greek, Mycenaean Greek and Ancient Greek. I think we should change it back because I've already started afew articles referring on four stages. We can always include it in italic for more information on Greek prior to the creation of the Greek alphabet see articles... as I did earlier. Cheers. Miskin 30 June 2005 17:29 (UTC)

Yes I know that I initially agreed to include it, but later I figured out why it's being differentiated. There's not a documented continuity between Mycenaean and the Archaic Greek language. Like proto-Greek, it's only recognisable as an early Greek language and not a stage on its evolution like Ancient Greek and Hellenistic Greek do. For what we know the Mycenaean language might have been a mere dialect of Greek during the Mycenaean Age and not a representative one (like Koine Greek is to Hellenistic. The most important element is the fact that it dates before the creation of the Greek alphabet. I think that every time we refer to the periods of the Greek language, it's best to mention the four stages and then provide a reference in Italic to Proto-Greek and Mycenaean, as the early Greek languages. In case you're interested to have a look, the articles I'm working on at the moment are Ancient Greek and Koine Greek. Miskin 1 July 2005 16:04 (UTC)

Titanic

Though I would post here as well as the reference desk as the question is a little old now.

Robert Ballard in his book The Discovery of the Titanic says that there are too many variables but it may have reached 25-30mph and depending how quickly it reached that speed it may have taken as little as six minutes to travel the 12,460 feet. MeltBanana 4 July 2005 22:54 (UTC)

Nelson

Thanks for your reply re Lord Nelson. I knew he had only one eye and simply presumed that he wore an eyepatch. PedanticallySpeaking 15:13, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Hebrew alphabet

Some nice work on orthography and especially phonetics; sputnikcccp has been doing some work on a more standardised form. It probably needs a little more work, but he should have moved them to the pages by now. See it at User:Sputnikcccp/Hebrew_Alphabet. --jnothman ^talk 23:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Hebrew languages

Although it's been fairly inactive, I thought you might want to join this project. --jnothman ^talk 02:19, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Hebrew languages

Although it's been fairly inactive, I thought you might want to join this project. --jnothman ^talk 02:19, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

Hi Ross, thanks for your note about IPA vs SAMPA. I didn't know there was a move to phase out SAMPA. It's not that I've got anything against IPA at all, in fact for my own purposes I'd much rather have it than anything else, but I feel SAMPA is more practical for web pages where nothing fancy is needed, just a simple broad transcription. I'm still having trouble getting IPA to display on my browser (not to mention that of other people's computers I might use) and I'm sure most people glancing at an entry will just give up when they see a string of non-appearing characters. I myself am too lazy to make much effort in that department -- when I see an entry that could do with some phonetics, I simply can't be bothered to go to the lengths of adding "proper" IPA phonetics, when SAMPA seems so much easier. Not a commendable attitude perhaps, but life is short. SAMPA is so delightfully straightforward and low-tech, unlike these exotic characters that cause such problems going from one platform to another. Also I'm very aware that even people with some background in languages are woefully ignorant of IPA. OK, that's a problem for SAMPA too, and of course you're right that not many people will be familiar with SAMPA and not with IPA, but it does look slightly less like double-Dutch to the uninitiated. I do sometimes attempt some kind of re-spelling ("Mickey Mouse phonetics") but of course they are often hopelessly ambiguous -- though I often feel that to give everyone a vague idea how something is pronounced is better than to give 2% of readers a precise idea. If there has to be a choice, that is -- surely there should be room for both, or all three: fuh-NET-iks, f@"nEtiks and (here goes) fəˈɛtɪks. No, I thought it was going to work but it didn't. Or did it? Not at this end. BTW, could you explain how to use the template you metioned? Flapdragon 16:35, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! Thanks for your help. Flapdragon 18:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Greek pronunciation - NPOV issue

Hello Ross, I want to warn you that User:Thrax is falsifying the page Ancient Greek pronunciation with unscientific non-NPOV statements that the pronunciation of Classical Greek was the same as that of Modern Greek. I am sure that, some day, he will do the same with the page Modern Greek. I urge you to participate in the debate: Talk:Ancient Greek pronunciation and voice your opinion. Maybe there some other users who are intereste in this. Andreas 19:24, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating. There is a particular point where I would like to know your opinion. User:Thrax tries to convince Wikipedia readers that Greek linguists as a whole share his opinion that the mediae were fricatives already in archaic times etc. What we would need is reference to Greek sources regarding the classical pronounciation of classical Attic Greek, in particular the consonants. Apart from scolarly works in Greek, this would also include contributions of Greek linguists in international scientific journals and at international conferences that cover the subject of classical Greek phonology. Andreas 20:26, 12 November 2005 (UTC) Andreas 20:43, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ross, Thrax continues his campaign on Ancient Greek pronunciation, following the strategy of the creationists: claiming that the Modern Greek pronunciation is an 'alternate theory'. But he has not been able to show any evidence that anyone but Caragounis subscribes to it. And he does not respond to rational argumentation.... What a waste of time! --Macrakis 21:47, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for alerting me that there is a mediatin going on for Ancient Greek phonology. This is too early: we are still missing important evidence. I would like to consult the following sources:

Ανδριώτης Ν., Ιστορική γραμματική της αρχαίας ελληνικής. Μέρος Α': Φωνητική (πανεπιστημιακές παραδόσεις), Θεσσαλονίκη 1969

Συμεωνίδης Χ., Ιστορική γραμματική της αρχαίας Ελληνικής. Μέρος Α': Φωνητική (πανεπιστημιακές παραδόσεις), Εκδοτικός Οίκος Αφών Κυριακίδη, Θεσσαλονίκη 1989.

I cannot get hold of these publications because I Iive in Montreal and they are not in the McGill library. Somebody living in Greece should be able to get these sources. My opinion is that the mediation should be put on hold (why the rush?) until we definitely know what Greek linguists teaching at the major Greek universities have to say. This is the reason why the discussion has dried up. Andreas 00:28, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ross, perhaps you might be interested to know that I have posed a question in Talk:List of Greek words with English derivatives

Also, a late answer: 10:35, 16 September 2005 Ross Burgess (→Α - Deleted "angelical" (is there such a word?)

Apparently there is an entry "angelical" in Roget's II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition, by the Editors of the American Heritage® Dictionary. [1]

thanks, --Odysses 13:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

digraphs in Greek

I'm glad you caught my sloppy statement about digraphs in Greek. I guess it didn't seem bizarre to me because I was thinking of Ancient Greek when I wrote it (don't know any Modern). Your correction highlights the fact that it's not alphabets or languages that have digraphs, but the combination of a language and an alphabet and a transcription system. Which I guess is what one calls a written language. So it's probably not sufficient to say e.g. Cyrillic doesn't have digraphs. Anyway, I was out on a limb when I wrote that whole paragraph, so thanks for fixing it up. -lethe ^talk 02:48, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Isthmian explanation

Thank you at last. Long have I speculated that it was because of the isthmus that is the SE of England. Cutler 01:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Dolwyddelan castle.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dolwyddelan castle.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 05:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek in Aramaic of Jesus (moved from User page)

Ross, the additions you are making to the Aramaic of Jesus article may not be in line with the manual of style, and some of the "corrections" to the Greek you're making aren't what are generally accepted by Greek scholars (and in many cases are minority readings). I have already brought this to the attention of Gareth Huges, one of the local moderators, but for now I ask you to put a hold on further revisions. --[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso] 23:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Just noted your comment on this. I imagine you're referring mainly to the readings that show ει rather than ι. These are as given in my new testament(British and Foreign Bible Society, Second Edition, 1958) and my "Pocket Lexicon of the New Testament" (Oxford, 1916) - but I'd be interested to see evidence to the contrary. By the way - I note you added your comments to my user page rather than the related talk page, whic would have been more usual, and would have alerted me to your comments more quickly! --rossb 00:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ross, I apologize for posting this on your main User page. I thought I was in the User_talk namespace (an embarassing mistake)! Peace, --Steve Caruso 01:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does the Pocket Lexicon indicate which manuscripts, or manuscript traditions, read "ει"? I cannot seem to find it in any of my sources (all of which simply read a lone iota). --Steve Caruso 01:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. I just found it in Tischendorf's Eighth Edition GNT which is based off of the Westcott-Hort compilation, however my copy of Westcott-Hort's work reads "ι". --Steve Caruso 01:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of pronunciation

In the Wikipedia manual of style for pronunciation guide, it states that IPA characters should not be linked. After I began to de-link IPA characters in a few phonology pages, various people who disagree with this convention have begun a discussion (in the talk page). I noticed that you were the first to put it in there and I think it would be helpful if you could contribute to the discussion since you, as far as I can tell, were the one who came up with it. AEuSoes1 23:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek alphabet

We seem to have a new username Atarnaris (though it may be a reincarnation of Xpo FERENS or Deucalionite) pushing the non-Phoenician story (Dispilio, etc.) on this page. You might want to watch it.... --Macrakis 22:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource in Ancient Greek

There is an ongoing initiative to create a Wikisurce in Ancient Greek. Please provide your comments at meta:Requests_for_new_languages/Ancient#Ancient_Greek_Wikisource. Andreas ^(T) 13:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unicoding SKolt Sámi

Thanks for unicoding the Skolt name in the Sami Parliament article; it helps a lot. If you wouldn't mind taking on the task, would you be willing to do the same for all articles pertaining to Skolt Sámi? The great majority of them are quite ugly looking due to being full of boxes on most screens. Thanks! -Yupik 12:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dante's Italian

Hi Ross, I came across your question at the wiki ref desk on Dante's Italian, when I was myself trying to work out if the Divine Comedy would be easier to read for an Italian than Shakespeare would be for me. I thought you might be interested in the following link: http://wordsmith.org/chat/hollanders.html It confirms that Dante would be much easier than Shakespeare, although it says nothing about the specific differences between his Italian and today's. Cheers The Mad Echidna 00:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IPA chart for English

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on IPA chart for English, by 219.122.82.117 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because IPA chart for English fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Kizu naoko was born in 1981

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting IPA chart for English, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate IPA chart for English itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

william parker

I am fascinated to know which books you have to hand. I have yet to track down a copy of the school history, though I must admit I havn't tried very hard. When I was there, I seem to recall Noel Bygate (deputy headmaster) had produced a revised edition, bringing it up to date as then was. I'm afraid I don't now recall exactly what I added to the article. My information either came from the school website, or from a leaflet issued for the opening of the new building at parkstone road. This was a few years before I went there, but they had a lot of copies to get rid of and I kept one......Just had a thought and found it. Yes, the quote is printed on the first page of the booklet, presumably as I posted it. I shall scan it and email you one if you reply to my email. Sandpiper 22:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC) The booklet also contains a lovely picture of the laying of the foundation stone by the marquess of exeter, 4 jul 1962, courtesy of Mr J. W. Wright. It would be really nice to include. I'm not sure, but was there a wright associated with the school who customarily took school pictures? (I'm presuming you have some familiarity with the school?). The booklet includes a staff list for september 1964 which includes an AA wright. Don't know if he might be a relative or a coincidence? Sandpiper[reply]

Update to the above: I now have borrowed a copy of the book and came across reference to Titus Otes attempting to become the parker schoolmaster. The book seems to imply this is the famous titus oates. Is this correct, and if so, wouldn't you say it was worth a mention in the history section? I shall read some more with a view to expanding the history. Sandpiper 21:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say that I agree that your tidy-up about the Hastings trolleys/buses is an improvement and then I saw the above. Do you know that J.W.Wright (the photographer) was indeed on the staff and taught English, while A.A.Wright taught Latin? There was never any suggestion that they were related. Mark126 19:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ross

Ah - then you would indeed know. I was 1953-61, Becket.Mark126 14:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

spam white list request

Just a heads up that the request you put in has been waiting on a response from you and may be archived shortly without action. -- SiobhanHansa 13:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Coast Trunk

Ok - it's whitelisted. I was amazed when I got here how many request seemed to be by users who requested a whitelisting and didn't edit/bother again. I decided that getting a response from someone & checking their contribs would be a start to testing how valid the request actually was! (& you have mail too!) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hellas (poem)

A tag has been placed on Hellas (poem), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 02:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mapp&lucia_dvd_cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mapp&lucia_dvd_cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 04:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

invite to Somerset WikiProject

Hello, this is an invitation to join WikiProject Somerset.

Thank you for editing the article Wiveliscombe.

You may be interested in joining WikiProject Somerset. This WikiProject aims to improve the standard of all articles relating to Somerset, which includes all subdivisions of the county, major buildings, roads and other related articles.

You can help by:

Creating new articles.
Expanding stubs.
Adding photographs.
Referencing articles.
Research topics.
Anything else really...

For more information, see the project page, and if you have any questions you can leave them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Somerset and someone will get back to you.

— Rod ^talk 14:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London

Wikimedia UK logo

Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008

Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map

More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12

Hello,

I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.

If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.

The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!

Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:44, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Word dividers

Regarding your edit on the Latin spelling and pronunciation article, the lacking word dividers in ab·oris and ob·iram were fully intentionally left out, to bring the orthography in accordance with the quote in the note: "... As a rule, interpuncta are used simply to divide words, except that prepositions are only rarely separated from the word they govern, if this follows next. ...". I haven't bothered reverting the edits, for of course it is by no means wrong as it stands now; but I just wanted to make you aware of the reason for the earlier version. —Alatius (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wandle

Hi Ross - good point on the Wandle but River Graveney is just a redirect, while the Norbury Brook article has content. Χόζ μνημά Regards Motmit (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CHE

thanks for correcting my edit, I meant to put 'was' back to 'is' when I realised CHE is still going, but forgot - I thought it has closed down a few years back. My mistake. Mish (talk) 21:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perton

I've noticed that you have changed the Perton removing the full stops I used for D.I.Y. I would like to say that it is not inappropriate for a U.K. subject as it is personal choice whether to include them and though in America they are used more than in the U.K. it is not incorrect to use them in the U.K. so does not worrent a change see http://www.queens-english-society.com/uploads/Errors_fullstop.pdf for more details. DanielR235 18:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielR235 (talk • contribs)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ross Burgess! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 388 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jeffrey Sterling, Baron Sterling of Plaistow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 03:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheque-less payments

Hi, saw your question on the RefDesk about the abolition of cheques. Have you found the Payments Council website yet? They're the body responsible. This page in particular has more information. I'm a Group Scout Leader, and my group still relies on cheques for many of our bigger purchases, so have been following this development with some interest. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 11:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus and Hinduism reliable sources

You'll need some kind of reliable source (WP:RELIABLE) for that claim in the Jesus in comparative mythology article. Especially because it's a contentious issue. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 15:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Elision in Latin

In Latin spelling and pronunciation you say that the first vowel was elided, however in the cited occurrence where the elision was actually shown ("scriptust" for "scriptum est") it appears that the last vowel was elided, could you explain this? (Flet1 (talk) 12:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Norwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Bloody Valentine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Georgia (country) to Georgia move suggestion

Please comment here. Thanks. georgianJORJADZE 18:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Transgender Day of Remembrance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[http://www.slago.org.uk/tdor/ Trans Day of Remembrance UK

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WikiIndex

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WikiIndex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Eiffel Tower replicas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Brighton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Edward Perry Warren

I sent you an email about the ongoing RM discussion. However, I'm unsure whether the email address is still active. I'd like to re-remind you of that, just in case. --George Ho (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Pride 2016

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ross Burgess. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We're on Twitter!

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!

Hello Ross Burgess!
Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)

For more information about Wiki Loves Pride, → click here ←.

RachelWex 17:50, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ross Burgess. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West Lothian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ross Burgess. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Falkland, Fife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Category A (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Burman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lynton and Barnstaple Railway

Lynton and Barnstaple Railway has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 04:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Phoenician and Greek alphabets

Template:Phoenician and Greek alphabets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 04:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SBIG

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SBIG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SBIG (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SBIG (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]