Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Canadian House of Commons/archive1

Canadian House of Commons

Self-nom. -- Emsworth 20:50, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Support, looks good. JYolkowski // talk 23:47, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support. Well the middle of some of those paragraphs could contain secrets from the Kama Sutra, but I was unable to force myself to read all of it to find out. :) What I did read was very good, and I support as much as my limited knowledge of the subject allows. - Taxman 20:36, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Support. Nice and smooth as usual, Emsworth. You could add the date you accessed the website in the references section. Phils 05:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support, maybe I'm just a biased Canadian but it looks like featured article material. Benw 11:52, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support, that is a good article says I. Rje 01:32, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
• object would it be possible, please, to do the same work here as you did to Westminster palace to make the references easier for us to check. For each part of the text say where it came from (invisible is okay) and for each reference give a brief comment what it's useful for. Not that we don't trust you :-) , but verifiability is a great goal. Mozzerati 13:27, 2005 Apr 23 (UTC)
  • Addressed. -- Emsworth 14:39, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)