Talk:Rock of Cashel

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rock of Cashel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ireland High‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Picture

What do you think to switch the b&w picture to this one ? Chmouel 17:06, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

cross picture

we have two pictures - one of them has to be wrong! --ClemMcGann 12:27, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bro what you Sigma skinidi no Rizz 178.208.119.160 (talk) 06:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

neither of these is the medieval high cross- these are the victorian gravestone crosses —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.43.192.70 (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of these crosses are ancient high crosses so I have added the tag victorian grave marker having them as a high crosses is misleading. Celtic Harper (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't say they were ancient high crosses, athough Ireland is dotted with them going back 1400 years, as you should know, being from Ireland yourself. Splitting hairs? ;~)) 13:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.19.195.14 (talk)

Castle

This is down as a castle but it isn't one should that be changed TMN81 (talk) 17:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the site actually consists of a 12th Century chapel and round tower, a 13th Century cathedral and a 15th Century residential castle all in one! Prior to the 11th Century, it was referred to as a "fortress", so take that to mean what you will. Personally, I think it's fine if it's just that the article is listed in a category for castles (as there is technically a castle mashed in there somewhere), but I won't argue against consensus if anybody else wants to chip in. Wasechun tashunka^HOWL_TRACK 18:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rock of Cashel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218070815/http://www.heritageireland.ie/en/South-East/RockofCashel/ to http://www.heritageireland.ie/en/south-east/rockofcashel/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

THE SITE ITSELF

Very historic maybe. A few more safety guards or gates but overall very well kept and lovely site 89.19.88.64 (talk) 10:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]