Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torrorism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by User:Henrygb

00:02, 2 May 2005 Henrygb deleted "Torrorism" (content starts '{{deletebecause| author blanked page, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Torrorism}}')

Sjakkalle 11:35, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Torrorism

Essay. Rant. WP is not a soapbox. Rl 17:26, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Author blanked the article. Reverted. Now someone put a speedy tag on that page. Rl 20:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if not speedy it. Cburnett 17:37, May 1, 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Ben Babcock 18:17, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. KFP 18:25, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not suitable for speedy. Delete. Nearly userfy but there is really nothing there remotely suitable for Wikipedia. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 18:35, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I propose the criteria for speedy delete be expanded to include personal, non-encyclopaedic, hopelessly POV rants. --Golbez 20:26, May 1, 2005 (UTC)
No need here: it was blanked by the creator. (History) That's been accepted as CSD 7 in the past, and perhaps 2. (All edits other than by the author pertained to deletion tags or the NPOV tag I threw on.) So it should be speediable now. Samaritan 20:46, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough. However, I ask that people use the proper reasoning for speedy requests (i.e. "db|author blanked page" rather than "db|rant"). Thanks. Rl 21:18, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.